Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
test split vs regex
(version: 0)
test split vs regex
Comparing performance of:
split vs match regex
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var testString = "testing\nNewlines\nBleh"
Tests:
split
var values = testString.split("\n"); var value1 = values[0]; var value2 = values[1]; var value3 = values[2];
match regex
var regex = testString.match(/.+((?=\n)|$)/g); var value1 = regex[0]; var value2 = regex[1]; var value3 = regex[2];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
split
match regex
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition** The `testString` variable is created with a string that contains multiple Newlines (`\n`) characters, as well as other characters like `Bleh`. This string is used to create two test cases: "split" and "match regex". **Options Compared** Two options are compared in these test cases: 1. **Split**: The `String.prototype.split()` method is used to split the string into an array of substrings based on a delimiter (`\n`). 2. **Regex Match**: A regular expression (`/.+((?=\\n)|$)/g`) is used to match any characters in the string that are followed by `\n` or are at the end of the string. **Pros and Cons** 1. **Split**: * Pros: Simple, easy to read, and well-documented. * Cons: May be slower for large strings due to the overhead of creating an array, and may not handle edge cases like multi-line strings with consecutive `\n` characters. 2. **Regex Match**: * Pros: Can handle complex patterns and edge cases, can be more efficient than splitting since it only scans the string once. * Cons: May be slower for simple use cases due to the overhead of compiling and executing regular expressions, and may be less readable. **Library Usage** There is no explicit library usage mentioned in these test cases. However, `String.prototype.split()` relies on the built-in JavaScript `split()` method implementation, which uses a regex engine under the hood. **Special JS Features/Syntax** Neither of the test cases utilizes any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what is standard for modern JavaScript. **Other Alternatives** Other alternatives to compare could include: 1. **Substring**: Using the `String.prototype.substring()` method to extract substrings. 2. **Array.prototype.forEach()**: Iterating over the split array using `forEach()` instead of accessing specific indices (`values[0]`, etc.). 3. **Regex-based iteration**: Using a regex to iterate over the string, potentially with more control over performance and readability. It's worth noting that these alternatives might not provide significant benefits for this particular benchmark, as the primary differences between `split()` and regular expressions are likely to be observed in scenarios with complex patterns or large datasets.
Related benchmarks:
String split using regex vs string v3
Split vs regexp
string.split(RegExp); vs string.split(string);
Regex vs Split for base64 string
Js Split vs Regex
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?