Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
if check object vs var
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
object vs var
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var object = {a: false}; var myvar = false;
Tests:
object
if (object.a == false) {console.log('asdf')}
var
if (myvar == false) {console.log('asdf')}
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
object
var
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data for the MeasureThat.net benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a simple JavaScript function that checks if the value of `object.a` or `myvar` (a variable) is equal to `false`. The goal is to compare the performance of using an object (`object`) versus a variable (`myvar`) in this specific context. **Script Preparation Code and Html Preparation Code** The script preparation code sets up two variables: `object` with a nested property `a` set to `false`, and `myvar` also set to `false`. The html preparation code is empty, which means that no additional HTML elements are being prepared for the benchmark. **Options Compared** In this benchmark, we have two options compared: 1. **Object access (`object.a == false`)**: This option uses an object property to check the value. 2. **Variable comparison (`myvar == false`)**: This option uses a variable to check the value. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **Object access**: + Pros: Can be more readable and maintainable when working with complex data structures or objects. + Cons: May be slower due to the overhead of accessing an object property, especially if it's nested deep within the object. * **Variable comparison**: + Pros: Typically faster since it doesn't involve accessing an object property. However, it may not be as readable and maintainable for complex data structures. + Cons: Can lead to unexpected behavior or errors if the variable is reassigned or goes out of scope. **Library Used** In this benchmark, no external libraries are used. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** None mentioned in the provided code snippet. **Benchmark Results** The latest benchmark results show that: * **Object access** (`object.a == false`) took 138984.359375 executions per second. * **Variable comparison** (`myvar == false`) took 138125.109375 executions per second. These results suggest that using an object property to check a value might be slightly slower than using a variable in this specific context. **Other Alternatives** If you were to implement a similar benchmark, you could consider adding additional options, such as: * Using `===` for strict equality comparison (e.g., `object.a === false`) * Using a function with the `this` keyword (e.g., `function check() { return this.a == false; }`) * Using a more complex data structure, like an array or a custom object * Adding additional variables or properties to the object or variable being checked
Related benchmarks:
instanceof vs undefined prop
! syntax vs === undefined
if (!x) syntax vs if (x === undefined)
instanceof vs check attr
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?