Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Test || and ??
(version: 0)
Test
Comparing performance of:
test ?? vs test ||
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var a=400,b='';
Tests:
test ??
var c = a ?? b;
test ||
var d = a || b
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
test ??
test ||
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmarking data and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is testing two JavaScript operators: `||` (logical OR) and `??` (optional chaining). The goal is to compare the performance of these two operators in different scenarios. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code is the same for both test cases: ```javascript var a = 400; var b = ''; ``` This code defines two variables, `a` and `b`, with specific values. **Html Preparation Code** Since there's no HTML preparation code provided, we can assume that the benchmark is running in a headless browser or a JavaScript-only environment. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **test ||** ```javascript var d = a || b; ``` This test case uses the `||` operator to evaluate the condition where `a` is truthy and `b` is falsy. In this case, since `a` has a value (400), the expression will return `a`. 2. **test ??** ```javascript var c = a ?? b; ``` This test case uses the `??` operator to evaluate the condition where `a` is truthy and `b` is falsy. In this case, since `a` has a value (400), the expression will return `c`, which is assigned the value of `a`. If `a` were null or undefined, the expression would return the value of `b`. **Library Used** There is no library explicitly mentioned in the benchmarking data. However, it's likely that a browser engine like V8 (used by Chrome) is involved in running the JavaScript code. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** The `??` operator is a relatively recent addition to the ECMAScript standard (ECMA 2020). It's also known as the "nullish coalescing operator". This operator allows you to provide a default value if an expression is null or undefined. **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** **`||` Operator:** Pros: * Widely supported across different browsers and JavaScript engines. * Easy to understand and use. Cons: * Can lead to unexpected behavior in certain scenarios, especially when used with strict equality checks (`===`) or null/undefined comparisons. **`??` Operator (Nullish Coalescing Operator):** Pros: * Provides a more explicit way of handling null or undefined values, making the code more readable. * Reduces the likelihood of unexpected behavior due to null or undefined comparisons. Cons: * Less widely supported across older browsers and JavaScript engines. However, support is rapidly increasing as new ECMAScript standards are adopted. **Other Considerations** When choosing between `||` and `??`, consider the specific use case and the expected behavior in different scenarios. If you need to handle null or undefined values explicitly and want a more readable way of doing so, use the `??` operator. If performance is critical and you're targeting older browsers that don't support the `??` operator, stick with the `||` operator. **Alternatives** Other alternatives for handling null or undefined values include: * Using the `typeof` operator to check the type of a value: `if (typeof x !== 'undefined') { ... }` * Using conditional statements (`if`, `switch`) to handle different scenarios. * Using the `?.` optional chaining operator (introduced in ECMAScript 2020) in combination with the `??` operator. These alternatives may provide more control over the behavior, but they can also add complexity and make the code harder to read.
Related benchmarks:
?: vs && and || operators
&& vs ||
?? vs ||
~~ vs ||
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?