Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
yllee-temp-test
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
with fragment vs no fragment
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
with fragment
var list = [], n = 0; while(true) { n++; var container = document.createDocumentFragment(); container.innerHTML ='<div data-var1 = "1" data-var2="2"></div>'; list.push(container.children [0]); if(n===100000) break; } console.log(list[0]);
no fragment
var list = [], n = 0; while(true) { n++; var div = document.createElement('div'); div.setAttribute ('data-var-1', '1'); div.setAttribute ('data-var-2', '2'); list.push(div); if(n===100000) break; } console.log(list[0]);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
with fragment
no fragment
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the JavaScript benchmarking test on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents two microbenchmarks: 1. `with fragment`: This benchmark creates multiple DOM elements (in this case, `div` tags) using the `document.createDocumentFragment()` method and appends them to a list. 2. `no fragment`: This benchmark creates multiple DOM elements in the same way as the previous one, but without using `createDocumentFragment()`. **Options Being Compared** The main options being compared are: * Using `createDocumentFragment()` vs not using it * Creating individual DOM elements (`div` tags) vs creating a document fragment and appending children to it **Pros and Cons of Each Approach:** 1. **Using `createDocumentFragment()`**: * Pros: + Faster execution times, since the browser doesn't need to create multiple DOM elements individually. + Can improve performance for large lists or complex DOM structures. * Cons: + May introduce additional complexity and overhead due to the fragment object's creation and management. 2. **Not using `createDocumentFragment()`**: + Pros: - Simple, straightforward approach with minimal overhead. - Easy to implement and understand for developers familiar with individual DOM elements. * Cons: - May result in slower execution times due to the need to create multiple DOM elements individually. **Library/Feature Used** The `document.createDocumentFragment()` method is a part of the Web API, which is not specific to any particular library. It's a native JavaScript method that allows you to create a new document fragment, which can be used to optimize rendering and layout by grouping multiple nodes together. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. The code uses standard ECMAScript features like `var`, `while` loops, and `document.createElement()`. **Alternative Approaches** If you want to test alternative approaches, you could consider: * Using a different DOM manipulation library, such as jQuery. * Implementing a custom DOM element creation function that takes into account the performance characteristics of each approach. * Using a virtual DOM or a library like React/Vue.js to optimize rendering and layout. Keep in mind that MeasureThat.net is focused on measuring the performance differences between various JavaScript approaches and libraries. If you want to explore alternative approaches, you may need to adapt or extend the benchmark to accommodate your specific requirements.
Related benchmarks:
comp test
testtestset
Truncate performance
Proxy overhead test vs classes
Search - Intl.Collator vs localeCompare vs normalize
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?