Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
createElement vs jquery
(version: 0)
create element with attributes
Comparing performance of:
createElement vs jquery
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>
Tests:
createElement
var list = [], n = 0; while(true) { n++; var el = document.createElement('div'); el.setAttribute ("data-var1", "1"); el.setAttribute ("data-var2", "2"); list.push(el); if(n===100000) break; }
jquery
var list = [], n = 0; while(true) { n++; var el= $('<div data-var1 = "1" data-var2="2">'); list.push(el); if(n===100000) break; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
createElement
jquery
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 134 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
createElement
32.4 Ops/sec
jquery
1.7 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark definitions and explain what's being tested, compared, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The `benchmark definition` is a JSON object that defines two test cases: `createElement` and `jquery`. Both tests are designed to compare the performance of creating HTML elements using JavaScript versus jQuery. **What's being tested?** The main goal of this benchmark is to measure the execution time, speed, or efficiency of: 1. Creating an HTML element (`document.createElement('div')`) with attributes (`setAttribute` method) in pure JavaScript. 2. Using jQuery to create a similar HTML element (`<div data-var1 = "1" data-var2="2">`) and adding it to a list. **Options compared** The benchmark compares two approaches: 1. **Pure JavaScript**: `document.createElement('div')`, which creates an empty `<div>` element. 2. **jQuery**: `$('<div data-var1 = "1" data-var2="2">')`, which uses jQuery's templating engine to create a HTML string and then parses it into a DOM element. **Pros and Cons** **Pure JavaScript:** Pros: * More control over the created element * No additional dependencies (no jQuery) * Can be more efficient in certain scenarios Cons: * May require more code and complexity for attribute manipulation * Can lead to slower execution times due to parsing and stringification overhead **jQuery:** Pros: * Faster execution times due to optimized rendering and parsing * Easier attribute management with the `data-` attributes * Simplified DOM creation and manipulation Cons: * Additional dependency (jQuery library) * Less control over the created element * May lead to slower performance if not optimized properly **Library: jQuery** The provided benchmark uses the jQuery 3.3.1 library, which is a popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation and event handling. The `jquery.js` script is loaded in the HTML preparation code. **Special JS feature or syntax:** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the jQuery templating engine uses a custom format to create HTML strings (`<div data-var1 = "1" data-var2="2">`), which is different from standard HTML syntax. **Other considerations** When writing performance benchmarks like this one: * Always define clear and concise benchmark definitions. * Use meaningful test names to help identify the results. * Consider using a more robust benchmarking framework to ensure accurate measurements. * Keep in mind that benchmark results may vary depending on the environment, hardware, and other factors. **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternatives or inspiration, here are some other JavaScript performance benchmarks: 1. [Benchmark.js](https://benchmarkjs.com/): A popular and widely-used benchmarking library for JavaScript. 2. [JSPerf](http://jsperf.com/): A community-driven benchmarking platform for JavaScript tests. 3. [Micro-benchmarking libraries like `benchmark` or `fast-dom-benchmarks`](https://www.npmjs.com/search?q=benchmark%20or%20fast-dom-benchmarks): There are several micro-benchmarking libraries available that provide a simple way to write and run performance benchmarks. Remember, when it comes to benchmarking JavaScript performance, accuracy is key. Always strive for clear definitions, concise code, and robust testing methodologies to ensure reliable results.
Related benchmarks:
id vs setAttribute
ES6+ vs JQuery select attribute
jQuery attr vs setAttribute
DataAttribute vs Class Selector vs ID Selector / JQuery
DataAttribute vs Class Selector vs ID Selector test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?