Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.from vs. ... expansion
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Array.from vs ... expansion
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var set = new Set([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20])
Tests:
Array.from
var arr = Array.from(set)
... expansion
var arr = [...set]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.from
... expansion
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested. **Overview** The benchmark measures the performance of two approaches to create an array from a Set object in JavaScript: using the `Array.from()` method and the spread operator (`...`). **What is being tested?** * Two test cases are compared: + Test Case 1: Using `Array.from(set)`, where `set` is a Set object created with a large number of elements. + Test Case 2: Using the spread operator (`arr = [...set]`), which expands the Set object into an array. **Options compared** The benchmark compares two options: 1. **Using `Array.from()`**: This method creates a new array from an iterable (in this case, the Set object). It's a built-in JavaScript method that provides a concise way to create arrays. 2. **Spread operator (`...`)**: This operator allows you to expand an iterable into an array. In this case, it expands the Set object. **Pros and Cons** * Using `Array.from()`: + Pros: - Concise and readable syntax - Well-documented and widely supported - Can handle non-array iterables (like Sets) with ease + Cons: - May have performance overhead due to the creation of a new array * Using the spread operator (`...`): + Pros: - Lightweight and efficient, as it only creates an array from the Set object without additional processing + Cons: - Less readable and concise syntax compared to `Array.from()` - May not be well-documented or widely supported in all browsers **Library usage** In this benchmark, no external libraries are used. The Set object is a built-in JavaScript data structure. **Special JS feature or syntax** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in the provided benchmark. Both `Array.from()` and the spread operator (`...`) are standard JavaScript features. **Alternative approaches** Other alternatives to create an array from a Set object might include: * Using `set.entries()` to convert the Set object into an iterator, followed by `Array.from()` * Using `Object.values()` or other methods to extract values from the Set object and then creating an array However, these alternatives are not tested in this benchmark. **Benchmark preparation code** The script preparation code creates a large Set object with 20 elements: ```javascript var set = new Set([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]); ``` This code is executed before each test case to ensure that the Set object has a consistent size and content.
Related benchmarks:
fromArray or desctucturing to convert Set to array
set.has vs. array.includes bigger sample
fastest way to convert set to array
set vs array iteration 9999
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?