Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
concat vs lodash.concat vs spread operator
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs Lodash concat vs Spread operator
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", "hello", "sname" ]; var other = [ "red", "wine" ].concat(params);
Lodash concat
var params = [ "hello", "hello", "sname" ]; var other = _.concat([ "red", "wine" ], params);
Spread operator
var params = ["hello", "hello", "sname"]; var other = [...["red", "wine"], ...params];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
Lodash concat
Spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is tested on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition** The website allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The benchmark definition is represented by a JSON object that contains information about the benchmark, including its name, description, script preparation code, HTML preparation code, and individual test cases. In this case, the benchmark is comparing the performance of three different approaches for concatenating arrays: `Array.prototype.concat`, `Lodash.concat` (a utility function from the Lodash library), and the spread operator (`...`). **Individual Test Cases** The test cases are represented by an array of objects, each containing a "Benchmark Definition" string that describes the specific scenario being tested. There are three test cases: 1. **Array.prototype.concat**: This test case creates two arrays, `params` and `other`, and concatenates them using the `concat()` method. 2. **Lodash concat**: This test case uses the Lodash library to concatenate two arrays: `["red", "wine"]` and `params`. 3. **Spread operator**: This test case creates two arrays, `params` and a new array containing `["red", "wine"]`, and concatenates them using the spread operator (`...`). **Library** The Lodash library is used in one of the test cases to provide a utility function for concatenating arrays. **Special JS Features/Syntax** None of the test cases use special JavaScript features or syntax that are not widely supported. The benchmark focuses on comparing the performance of different array concatenation methods. **Options Compared** The three options being compared are: 1. **Array.prototype.concat**: This method is part of the built-in JavaScript Array prototype and has a specific syntax. 2. **Lodash.concat**: This function is part of the Lodash library and provides an alternative way to concatenate arrays. 3. **Spread operator (`...`)**: This is a modern JavaScript feature that allows for concise array concatenation. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach: 1. **Array.prototype.concat**: Pros: widely supported, efficient for small arrays. Cons: can be slow for large arrays due to the need to create a new array. 2. **Lodash.concat**: Pros: provides an alternative way to concatenate arrays, may be faster than Array.prototype.concat for some scenarios. Cons: requires including the Lodash library, may not be suitable for all use cases. 3. **Spread operator (`...`)**: Pros: concise and expressive, efficient for large arrays. Cons: only supported in modern browsers or environments that support ES6+ syntax. **Other Alternatives** There are other array concatenation methods available, such as using `Array.prototype.push()` or the `.concat()` method with an array of indices. However, these alternatives may not be as concise or efficient as the three options being compared. In summary, MeasureThat.net provides a useful benchmark for comparing the performance of different array concatenation methods in JavaScript. By testing these approaches, developers can choose the most suitable option for their specific use case and ensure optimal performance.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator vs lodash concat
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator vs lodash.concat - variable and constant
Array concat vs spread operator vs push (many)
array find vs some vs lodash
lodash _.indexOf vs native indexOf with strings
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?