Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
filter and then for vs for
(version: 0)
test
Comparing performance of:
Filter and then FOR vs just FOR
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Filter and then FOR
let arrayOne = ['A','B','C','B','C','D','E','v','C','D','C','D','E','v','v']; let result = []; arrayOne.filter(x => x === 'C').forEach(x => { result.push(x) })
just FOR
let arrayOne = ['A','B','C','B','C','D','E','v','C','D','C','D','E','v','v']; let result = []; arrayOne.forEach(x => { if(x === 'C'){ result.push(x); } })
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Filter and then FOR
just FOR
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON, which represents a benchmark on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is called "filter and then for vs for". It's designed to compare the performance of two approaches: using the `filter()` method followed by `forEach()`, versus using only a single `forEach()` loop with an `if` statement inside. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Filter and then FOR**: This approach uses the `filter()` method to create a new array containing only elements that match a certain condition (in this case, `'C'`). The resulting array is then iterated over using `forEach()`, pushing each element onto a new array (`result`). 2. **just FOR**: This approach uses only a single `forEach()` loop to iterate over the original array. Inside the loop, an `if` statement checks if each element matches the condition `'C'`. If it does, the element is pushed onto a new array (`result`). **Library and Special JS Features** There are no external libraries used in this benchmark. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Filter and then FOR** * Pros: The `filter()` method can be more concise and expressive, especially when dealing with complex conditions. * Cons: + The resulting array may have a different structure than the original array (e.g., removing elements). + Additional memory allocation is required for the new filtered array. 2. **just FOR** * Pros: This approach avoids creating an additional filtered array, which can be beneficial when working with large datasets or limited resources. * Cons: + The code may become less readable and more prone to errors due to the nested `if` statement inside the loop. **Other Considerations** 1. **Performance**: In this benchmark, the "just FOR" approach outperforms the "Filter and then FOR" method, likely because it avoids creating an additional filtered array. 2. **Code Readability**: The choice between these approaches depends on the specific use case and personal preference for code readability. **Other Alternatives** In addition to the `filter()` method and a single `forEach()` loop with an `if` statement, other alternatives might include: 1. **Array.prototype.some()**: This method returns `true` if at least one element in the array satisfies the provided condition. 2. **Array.prototype.every()**: Similar to `some()`, but it returns `true` only if all elements satisfy the condition. These alternatives might offer better performance or readability depending on the specific use case.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.filter vs Lodash filter vs For vs for..in vs for..of
filter vs some
filter vs some vs includes
.filter(Boolean) vs .filter(e => e)
filter vs if
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?