Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
json parse vs string to dict2
(version: 2)
Comparing performance of:
json parse vs str split to dictionary
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var text1 = {"LoginTime":"2018-02-14 08:51:48.0","User":"f00dl3","RemoteIP":"127.0.0.1","LoginTime1":"2018-02-14 08:51:48.0","User1":"f00dl3","RemoteIP1":"127.0.0.1","LoginTime2":"2018-02-14 08:51:48.0","User2":"f00dl3","RemoteIP2":"127.0.0.1"}; var str = JSON.stringify(text1);
Tests:
json parse
const Object1=JSON.parse(str);
str split to dictionary
var l =str.split(/[:,]/); var d = {}; for (var i =0;i< l.length;i=i+2) {var a = l[i];var b=l[i+1];d[a] = b;}
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
json parse
str split to dictionary
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined as a JSON object that contains two main pieces of information: 1. **Script Preparation Code**: This is a JavaScript code snippet that prepares the data for the benchmark. It creates an object `text1` with various properties, including strings, integers, and floats. Then it stringifies this object using the `JSON.stringify()` function and assigns it to the variable `str`. 2. **Html Preparation Code**: This field is empty, which means no HTML-related code is needed for the benchmark. **Individual Test Cases** The benchmark consists of two test cases: 1. **Test Case 1: "json parse"** This test case uses the `JSON.parse()` function to parse the stringified object `str` and converts it back into a JavaScript object. 2. **Test Case 2: "str split to dictionary"** This test case uses a custom implementation to convert the string `str` into a JavaScript object by splitting the string on commas (`/[:,]/`) and then iterating over the resulting array, assigning each pair of elements to an object key-value pair. **Library Used** In Test Case 1, the `JSON.parse()` function is used, which is a built-in JavaScript method for parsing JSON strings into JavaScript objects. This library is part of the ECMAScript standard and does not require any external dependencies. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes used in this benchmark. **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** The two test cases have different approaches to achieve the same goal: 1. **JSON.parse()**: This method is concise and efficient, as it uses a built-in function that can handle most common JSON formats. However: * Pros: Fast execution time and minimal code. * Cons: May not work correctly with malformed or compressed JSON strings. 2. **Custom implementation (str split to dictionary)**: This approach provides more control over the parsing process but requires more code and iterations: * Pros: Can handle complex or non-standard data formats, does not rely on built-in functions. * Cons: More verbose code, potentially slower execution time. **Other Alternatives** If you were to rewrite this benchmark using alternative approaches, some options could be: 1. Using a different JSON parsing library (e.g., `fast-json-parser`). 2. Implementing custom JSON parsing logic from scratch. 3. Using regular expressions instead of string splitting for the second test case. However, these alternatives would likely require more significant changes to the benchmark code and may not provide substantial performance benefits.
Related benchmarks:
ITFB. Reinventing JSON parser
Try/catch performance (JSON parse) 2
Try/catch performance (JSON parse) (Log)
lowerCase lodash vs native
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?