Benchmark: filter vs reduce control

Script Preparation code:

var relationships = [{source_ref: "blahblahsighting"},{source_ref: "blahblahsighting"},{source_ref: "blahblahsighting"},{source_ref: "blahblahsing"},{source_ref: "blahblahsing"},{source_ref: "blahblahsighting"}]

Tests:

filter + includes
relationships.filter((relationship) => relationship.source_ref.includes("sighting"))
reduce + includes
relationships.reduce((mem, relationship) => { if (relationship.source_ref.includes("sighting")) { mem.push(relationship) } return mem; }, [])
filter + indexOf
relationships.filter((relationship) => relationship.source_ref.indexOf("sighting") > -1)
reduce + indexOf
relationships.reduce((mem, relationship) => { if (relationship.source_ref.indexOf("sighting") > -1) { mem.push(relationship) } return mem; }, [])

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
filter + includes
reduce + includes
filter + indexOf
reduce + indexOf

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Related benchmarks:

filter vs reduce control (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: filter + includes vs reduce + includes vs filter + indexOf vs reduce + indexOf

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

filter + includes

reduce + includes

filter + indexOf

reduce + indexOf

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results