Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Compare speed
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
contains() method vs parrentElement
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id="outer"> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div id="inner"> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div id="outer2"> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div id="inner2"> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div>
Script Preparation code:
var inner = document.getElementById("inner"); var outer = document.getElementById("outer");
Tests:
contains() method
outer.contains(inner) === true
parrentElement
inner.parentElement === outer
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
contains() method
parrentElement
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of each approach. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark measures the speed of two JavaScript methods: `outer.contains(inner)` and `inner.parentElement === outer`. The script prepares the HTML structure by creating a nested div with an inner div inside it. The benchmark then checks if the inner div is contained within the outer div using both methods. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code retrieves two HTML elements: `outer` and `inner`, which are part of the nested div structure created in the HTML preparation code. **Html Preparation Code** The HTML preparation code creates a deeply nested div structure with multiple levels of nesting, including an inner div. This is done to test the performance of both methods on a complex HTML structure. **Individual Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **contains() method**: This test case measures the speed of the `outer.contains(inner)` method. 2. **parrentElement**: This test case measures the speed of the `inner.parentElement === outer` expression. **Comparison** The benchmark compares the performance of both methods on the same HTML structure. **Options Compared** 1. **Using `contains()` method**: This method checks if the inner div is contained within the outer div by iterating over the DOM tree. 2. **Using `parrentElement === outer` expression**: This expression directly compares the parent element of the inner div with the outer div. **Pros and Cons** 1. **Using `contains()` method**: * Pros: More accurate, as it checks for containment in a more comprehensive way. * Cons: Can be slower due to the iteration over the DOM tree. 2. **Using `parrentElement === outer` expression**: * Pros: Faster, as it directly compares two elements without iterating over the DOM tree. * Cons: May not accurately represent the containment relationship, especially in complex HTML structures. **Libraries and Special JS Features** There are no libraries used in this benchmark. However, the `contains()` method is a built-in JavaScript method that uses the `indexOf()` method internally to check for containment. No special JS features or syntax are being tested in this benchmark. **Alternatives** Other alternatives could include: 1. **Using `querySelector` and `querySelectorAll` methods**: Instead of using `contains()`, you could use `querySelector` and `querySelectorAll` to select the inner div. 2. **Using a library like jQuery**: You could use jQuery's `contains()` method or other jQuery-specific selectors to compare containment relationships. 3. **Using a different expression**: You could try alternative expressions, such as using `element.matches()` or `element.contains()`, to see if they perform better. Keep in mind that the performance differences between these alternatives may be negligible in most cases, and the benchmark results should be taken into context when evaluating their relevance to real-world use cases.
Related benchmarks:
Jquery fastest selector
contains2 vs closest2
contains2 vs closest
Compare method
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?