Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object.fromEntries vs reduce without tostring function
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Object.fromEntries vs Reduce (reuse object) vs Reduce (creating temporary objects)
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var data = { ...Array.from(Array(10000).keys()) };
Tests:
Object.fromEntries
Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(data).map((key, value) => [key, value]));
Reduce (reuse object)
Object.entries(data).reduce((acc, [k, v]) => { acc[k] = v; return acc; }, {});
Reduce (creating temporary objects)
Object.entries(data).reduce((acc, [k, v]) => ({ ...acc, [k]: v }), {});
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object.fromEntries
Reduce (reuse object)
Reduce (creating temporary objects)
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark JSON and explain what is tested, compared, and considered in this JavaScript microbenchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares three approaches to create an object from an array of key-value pairs: 1. `Object.fromEntries` 2. `Object.entries.reduce` (with a reusable object as the accumulator) 3. `Object.entries.reduce` (creating temporary objects for each iteration) **Options Compared** * `Object.fromEntries`: A modern JavaScript method introduced in ECMAScript 2015, which creates an object from an array of key-value pairs. * `Object.entries.reduce` with a reusable object: This approach uses the `reduce()` method to accumulate values into an object, reusing the existing object as the accumulator. * `Object.entries.reduce` creating temporary objects: In this version, a new object is created for each iteration, accumulating values. **Pros and Cons** * **Object.fromEntries**: Fast, modern, and concise. It's likely to be implemented in native code by most browsers. * **Object.entries.reduce (reuse object)**: + Pros: Can reuse the existing object as the accumulator, potentially reducing memory allocation and garbage collection overhead. + Cons: May incur additional overhead due to the `reduce()` method and potential object cloning. * **Object.entries.reduce (creating temporary objects)**: + Pros: Simple and easy to understand. No special library or implementation required. + Cons: Potentially slower than other approaches, especially for large arrays, due to the repeated creation of new objects. **Library/Utility Used** None are explicitly mentioned in the benchmark code, but `Array.from()` is used to create an array from a specified number of keys. This method is a built-in utility function in JavaScript. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** None are explicitly mentioned or used in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** Additional approaches to create an object from an array of key-value pairs might include: * `Array.prototype.reduce()`: Similar to the second approach, but uses `reduce()` on the `Array` prototype instead. * Manual iteration and object construction using a `for...of` loop and `Object.defineProperty()` or similar methods. * Using libraries like Lodash or Ramda, which provide utility functions for creating objects from arrays. It's worth noting that the choice of approach often depends on the specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preference.
Related benchmarks:
reduce (immutable) vs map + fromEntries
Object.fromEntries vs create temp object vs Array.reduce
Map & Object.fromEntries vs reduce
Object.fromEntries on array vs reduce on array
Object.fromEntries vs reduce round 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?