Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
apply VS call 2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
apply vs call
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
apply
Math.max.apply(null, [5, 6, 2, 3, 4, 7]);
call
Math.max.call(null, 5, 6, 2, 3, 4, 7);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
apply
call
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the benchmark test case. **What is being tested?** The benchmark compares two different ways to call the `Math.max` function in JavaScript: 1. Using the `apply` method: `Math.max.apply(null, [5, 6, 2, 3, 4, 7]);` 2. Using the `call` method: `Math.max.call(null, 5, 6, 2, 3, 4, 7);` **What options are compared?** In this test case, two options are being compared: 1. **Option 1:** Using `apply` to call `Math.max` * Pros: + Allows passing an array of arguments using the `apply` method + Can be more concise in certain situations * Cons: + May have performance implications due to the overhead of creating a function context (more on this later) 2. **Option 2:** Using `call` to call `Math.max` * Pros: + Directly passes individual arguments using the `call` method + Typically has better performance since it avoids the overhead of creating a function context * Cons: + Less concise than using `apply` **Other considerations** When choosing between `apply` and `call`, consider the following: 1. **Performance:** In general, using `call` is faster because it doesn't require creating an additional function context. 2. **Conciseness:** If you need to pass multiple arguments in a concise manner, using `apply` can be more convenient. **Library usage** In this test case, there's no specific library used other than the native JavaScript Math object (`Math.max`). **Special JS feature or syntax** There are no special features or syntax used in this test case. The benchmark is straightforward and only demonstrates a simple comparison between two function calling methods. **Alternatives** If you need to call a function with multiple arguments, consider using: 1. **Spread operator (ES6+):** `Math.max(...[5, 6, 2, 3, 4, 7]);` (more concise and readable) 2. **Array.prototype.forEach():** `(function(max) { max(5, 6, 2, 3, 4, 7); })(Math.max);` Keep in mind that these alternatives may have their own performance implications or trade-offs. That's it! I hope this explanation helps you understand the benchmark test case.
Related benchmarks:
Explicit call vs apply
Explicit call vs apply
bind vs call vs apply
apply VS call
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?