Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
apply VS call 2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
apply vs call
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
apply
Math.max.apply(null, [5, 6, 2, 3, 4, 7]);
call
Math.max.call(null, 5, 6, 2, 3, 4, 7);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
apply
call
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark compares two methods for finding the maximum value among a set of numbers: `Math.max.apply()` and `Math.max.call()`. Let's break it down: **Options Compared:** * **`apply()`:** This method takes an object (here, `null`) as the 'this' context and then accepts a single argument – an array of values to work with (`[5, 6, 2, 3, 4, 7]`). * **`call()`:** Similar to `apply()`, this method also sets the 'this' context to `null`. However, it takes individual arguments for each value in the set (5, 6, 2, 3, 4, 7). **Pros and Cons:** * **`apply()`:** * **Concise:** You pass all values within a single array. This can be more readable when dealing with multiple arguments. * **Potential Performance Advantage:** `apply()` might have a slight performance edge in some scenarios due to how it handles argument passing internally. * **`call()`:** * **Explicit Argument Passing:** Some developers find it clearer to explicitly list each argument. * **Potentially More Debug-Friendly:** When debugging, it's often easier to see the individual arguments being passed with `call()`. **Considerations:** * The difference in performance between `apply()` and `call()` is generally very small. In most real-world applications, you'll likely not notice a significant impact. * Choose the method that aligns better with your coding style and project preferences. **Alternatives:** While this benchmark focuses on `apply()` and `call()`, there are other ways to find the maximum value: * **`Array.reduce()`:** This higher-order function can efficiently iterate over an array and calculate a cumulative result (in this case, finding the maximum). ```javascript const max = [5, 6, 2, 3, 4, 7].reduce((a, b) => Math.max(a, b)); // Returns 7 ```
Related benchmarks:
Explicit call vs apply
Explicit call vs apply
bind vs call vs apply
apply VS call
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?