Benchmark: join vs trim vs filter

Script Preparation code:

var A = 'test1';
var B = 'test2';

Tests:

join
var result = [A, B].join(' ');
trim
var result = `${A} ${B}`.trim();
filter
var result = `${[A, B].filter(Boolean)}`;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
join
trim
filter

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Overview of the Benchmark**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case on MeasureThat.net. The benchmark tests three different approaches to concatenate two strings: `join()`, `trim()` with template literals, and `filter(Boolean)`.

**Options Compared**

* `join()`: This method concatenates two or more strings with a specified separator.
* `trim()` with template literals (e.g., `${A} ${B}`): Template literals provide a way to embed expressions inside backticks (`) without the need for escaping or quotes. The `trim()` function removes whitespace from the beginning and end of a string.
* `filter(Boolean)`: This method creates a new array with all elements that pass the test implemented by the provided function.

**Pros and Cons**

1. **`join()`**:
	* Pros:
		+ Simple and straightforward implementation
		+ Fast execution time due to its optimized internal logic
	* Cons:
		+ Requires explicit separator string creation, which can be cumbersome for large strings
		+ May not handle non-string inputs correctly (e.g., numbers)
2. **`trim()` with template literals**:
	* Pros:
		+ More readable and concise code
		+ Reduces the need for explicit string manipulation
	* Cons:
		+ May have slower execution time compared to `join()`
		+ Requires a supported JavaScript engine (most modern browsers support it, but older engines might not)
3. **`filter(Boolean)`**:
	* Pros:
		+ Very concise and readable code
		+ Eliminates the need for explicit string concatenation or separator strings
	* Cons:
		+ May have slower execution time compared to `join()` due to array creation and filtering overhead
		+ Requires a supported JavaScript engine (most modern browsers support it, but older engines might not)

**Library Used**

None. The benchmark uses built-in JavaScript functions.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

None mentioned in the provided JSON. However, template literals (`${A} ${B}`) are used in one of the test cases.

**Other Considerations**

When choosing between these approaches, consider the following factors:

* **Code readability and maintainability**: If you need to write code that is easy to understand and modify, `trim()` with template literals might be a better choice.
* **Performance**: If you prioritize speed over readability, `join()` might be the best option.
* **Browser support**: Ensure that your target browsers support the chosen method. Template literals and `filter(Boolean)` are generally supported in modern browsers, while older engines might require explicit separator strings for `join()`.
* **Input handling**: Be aware of how each approach handles non-string inputs (e.g., numbers).

**Alternatives**

If you need to concatenate multiple strings or want to explore other approaches, consider the following alternatives:

1. **`concat()` method**: This method concatenates two or more arrays into a single array.
2. **`Array.prototype.reduce()` method**: This method applies a reduction function to an array, returning a single value.
3. **String interpolation libraries**: Libraries like Lit or React's string interpolation feature provide more advanced string manipulation capabilities.

When benchmarking JavaScript code, it's essential to consider the specific requirements of your use case and choose the approach that best balances performance, readability, and browser support.

Related benchmarks:

join vs trim vs filter (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: join vs trim vs filter

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

join

trim

filter

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):