Benchmark: Component re-renders 5

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.13.1/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.13.1/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
<div id="root"></div>

Script Preparation code:

function Baseline () {
  return React.createElement('div')
}

function FunctionalComponent1 () {
  return React.createElement('div')
}


function FunctionalComponent2 () {
  return React.createElement(FunctionalComponent1)
}

function FunctionalComponent3 () {
  return React.createElement(FunctionalComponent2)
}

function FunctionalComponent4 () {
  return React.createElement(FunctionalComponent3)
}

function renderFunctionalComponent2 () {
  return FunctionalComponent1()
}

function renderFunctionalComponent3 () {
  return renderFunctionalComponent2()
}

function RenderFunctionalComponent4 () {
  return renderFunctionalComponent3()
}

Tests:

Baseline1
ReactDOM.render(React.createElement(Baseline), document.getElementById('root'))
Baseline2
ReactDOM.render(React.createElement(Baseline), document.getElementById('root'))
FunctionalComponent1
ReactDOM.render(React.createElement(FunctionalComponent1), document.getElementById('root'))
FunctionalComponent2
ReactDOM.render(React.createElement(FunctionalComponent2), document.getElementById('root'))
FunctionalComponent3
ReactDOM.render(React.createElement(FunctionalComponent3), document.getElementById('root'))
FunctionalComponent4
ReactDOM.render(React.createElement(FunctionalComponent4), document.getElementById('root'))
RenderFunctionalComponent4
ReactDOM.render(React.createElement(RenderFunctionalComponent4), document.getElementById('root'))
Baseline3
ReactDOM.render(React.createElement(Baseline), document.getElementById('root'))

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Baseline1
Baseline2
FunctionalComponent1
FunctionalComponent2
FunctionalComponent3
FunctionalComponent4
RenderFunctionalComponent4
Baseline3

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons of each approach, and other considerations.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark measures the performance of React component re-renders in different scenarios. It uses JavaScript to create a series of React components, from a simple baseline component (`Baseline`) to more complex nested components (`FunctionalComponent1`, `FunctionalComponent2`, etc.). The benchmark compares the execution times of these components using ReactDOM.render().

**Script Preparation Code**

The Script Preparation Code defines the following React components:

* `Baseline`: A simple component that returns an empty `div` element.
* `FunctionalComponent1`, `FunctionalComponent2`, `FunctionalComponent3`, and `FunctionalComponent4`: These components create a nested structure, with each one building upon the previous one.

**Html Preparation Code**

The Html Preparation Code includes the necessary React library files (`react.production.min.js` and `react-dom.production.min.js`) and creates a `div` element with an ID of "root".

**Individual Test Cases**

Each test case is defined by a Benchmark Definition, which specifies how to render the corresponding React component using ReactDOM.render(). The test cases are:

* Baseline1: Renders the `Baseline` component.
* Baseline2: Renders the `Baseline` component (same as Baseline1).
* FunctionalComponent1: Renders the `FunctionalComponent1` component.
* ...
* RenderFunctionalComponent4: Renders the `RenderFunctionalComponent4` component.

**Comparison Options**

The benchmark compares the performance of different React components, specifically:

* Simple baseline component (`Baseline`) vs. more complex nested components (`FunctionalComponent1`, `FunctionalComponent2`, etc.).

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

* **Simple Baseline Component (Baseline)**:
	+ Pros: Easy to create and understand, minimal overhead.
	+ Cons: May not accurately reflect real-world performance.
* **Nested Components (FunctionalComponent1, FunctionalComponent2, etc.)**:
	+ Pros: More realistic representation of complex React applications.
	+ Cons: Increased complexity, potential performance overhead due to recursive rendering.

**Other Considerations**

* The benchmark uses a single user agent string (`Chrome 98`), which may limit the scope of the results. To make the benchmark more representative, it would be beneficial to include multiple browsers and device types.
* The benchmark does not account for other factors that can affect performance, such as network latency, server-side rendering, or optimized code.

In summary, the benchmark provides a basic comparison between simple and complex React components, which can help identify potential performance bottlenecks in React applications. However, to gain more accurate insights, it would be beneficial to expand the scope of the benchmark to include multiple browsers, device types, and other factors that can impact performance.

Related benchmarks:

Component re-renders 5 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Baseline1 vs Baseline2 vs FunctionalComponent1 vs FunctionalComponent2 vs FunctionalComponent3 vs FunctionalComponent4 vs RenderFunctionalComponent4 vs Baseline3

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Baseline1

Baseline2

FunctionalComponent1

FunctionalComponent2

FunctionalComponent3

FunctionalComponent4

RenderFunctionalComponent4

Baseline3

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):