Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
string vs template
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
string vs template string
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var myYear = 2020;
Tests:
string
String(myYear);
template string
`${myYear}`;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
string
template string
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and explore what's being tested in this benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that contains information about the test. In this case, it has two options being compared: * `String(myYear);` * ```${myYear}``` (template string) These are two different ways to create strings in JavaScript. **What's being tested?** The benchmark is testing the performance difference between using a traditional `String()` constructor and template strings. Template strings, introduced in ECMAScript 2015, provide a more readable way of embedding expressions inside string literals. **Options compared** Here are the options being compared: * **Traditional `String()` constructor**: This approach uses the `String()` function to create a new string object from a given value or expression. * **Template strings**: These use backticks (`) around a template literal, which allows you to embed expressions inside the string using `${expression}`. **Pros and Cons of each approach** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **Traditional `String()` constructor**: + Pros: Simple, widely supported, and easy to understand. + Cons: Can be verbose and less readable than template strings. * **Template strings**: + Pros: More readable, concise, and expressive. Reduces the need for concatenation or string interpolation. + Cons: May require more browser support (although it's been widely adopted). **Library/Feature** There is no specific library being used in this benchmark. However, template strings are a built-in feature of ECMAScript 2015. **Special JS feature/Syntax** This benchmark uses the `${}` syntax for template strings, which was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This allows you to embed expressions inside string literals using backticks and curly braces. **Other alternatives** If you're looking for alternative ways to create strings in JavaScript, here are a few options: * **String concatenation**: Using the `+` operator or the `.concat()` method. * **String formatting**: Using libraries like Moment.js or js-formatted. * **HTML string escaping**: Using libraries like DOMPurify or js-escapes. These alternatives may have their own performance implications, depending on the specific use case and requirements.
Related benchmarks:
Date: Object.prototype.toString vs instanceof
string vs template vs toString
Concatenation vs Template String
substring vs split datetime
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?