Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
innerText vs insertAdjacentText
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of: innerText vs insertAdjacentText
Comparing performance of:
innerText vs insertAdjacentText
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id="target"></div>
Tests:
innerText
document.getElementById('target').innerText += 'New text.';
insertAdjacentText
document.getElementById('target').insertAdjacentText('beforeend', 'New text.');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
innerText
insertAdjacentText
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in this benchmark and explore the options, pros, cons, and other considerations. **What is being tested?** The benchmark is comparing the performance of two approaches: 1. `innerText` (also known as DOM methods) 2. `insertAdjacentText` Both approaches are used to dynamically update the text content of an HTML element. However, they differ in how they manipulate the DOM and perform string operations. **Options being compared:** The two options being compared are: 1. **DOM methods**: Using the `innerText` property or other DOM methods like `textContent`, `innerHTML`, etc. 2. **String interpolation with insertAdjacentText**: Using the `insertAdjacentText` method to add text to an element, which is essentially a string interpolation technique. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **DOM methods (innerText)**: * Pros: + More traditional and widely supported approach. + Can be more efficient for small strings. * Cons: + May incur additional DOM mutations, which can lead to slower performance. + Can be less flexible for large strings or complex text manipulations. 2. **String interpolation with insertAdjacentText**: * Pros: + More efficient and optimized for large strings. + Reduces the number of DOM mutations. * Cons: + Less traditional approach, may require more setup. + Not supported by older browsers or environments. **Library usage:** None explicitly mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. However, `insertAdjacentText` is a standard method defined in the HTML5 specification, which means it's likely being used natively within modern browsers. **Special JS features or syntax:** The benchmark doesn't mention any special JavaScript features or syntax, such as ES6+ features like arrow functions, async/await, or Promises. The code appears to be using vanilla JavaScript and DOM methods. **Other alternatives:** If you were looking for alternative approaches, some options could include: 1. **Using a template engine**: Libraries like Handlebars, Mustache, or Pug can help with string interpolation and templating. 2. **String manipulation libraries**: Libraries like StringPilot or StringManipulation can provide optimized string manipulation functions. 3. **DOM manipulation libraries**: Libraries like jQuery or React can simplify DOM manipulations and offer alternative approaches to DOM methods. Keep in mind that these alternatives might come with their own trade-offs, such as added overhead or dependence on additional dependencies. In summary, the benchmark is comparing two approaches for dynamic text updates: traditional DOM methods (`innerText`) versus string interpolation with `insertAdjacentText`. The latter approach is likely optimized for large strings and reduces DOM mutations.
Related benchmarks:
createTextNode vs innerHTML vs innerText
innerText vs textContent + trim (HTML)
innerText vs innerHTML (performance 3)
innerText vs innerHTML vs textContent
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?