Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object.values Vs Array.join for arrays
(version: 0)
Object.values Vs Array.join for arrays
Comparing performance of:
Object.values vs Array.join
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Object.values
var arr = ["a", "b", "a", "b", "a", "b", "a", "b", "a", "b", "a", "b"] for(var i=0; i<100; i++){ Object.values(arr).toString(); }
Array.join
var arr = ["a", "b", "a", "b", "a", "b", "a", "b", "a", "b", "a", "b"] for(var i=0; i<100; i++){ arr.join(",") }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Object.values
Array.join
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and some pros and cons of each approach. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two JavaScript methods for accessing array elements: 1. `Object.values(arr)` (tested in the "Object.values" test case) 2. `arr.join(",")` (tested in the "Array.join" test case) These two methods are being compared on an array of strings, where each string is repeated multiple times. **What's Being Tested** The benchmark measures the execution time of each method for a large number of iterations (100 times). The goal is to determine which method performs better in terms of speed. **Options Compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **`Object.values(arr)`**: This method returns an array containing all values from the original array. It's a convenient way to get an array of values without having to use indexing or loops. 2. **`arr.join(",")`**: This method concatenates all elements in the array into a single string, separated by commas. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **`Object.values(arr)`** + Pros: - Convenient way to get an array of values - No need for indexing or loops + Cons: - Creates a new array, which can be memory-intensive - May have slower performance due to the overhead of creating a new array * **`arr.join(",")`** + Pros: - Fast and efficient way to concatenate strings - No need for additional memory allocation + Cons: - Requires a string separator (in this case, a comma) - May not be suitable for all use cases where separate values are needed **Library: None** Neither of the methods uses any external libraries. **Special JS Features/Syntax** None mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that `Object.values()` is a relatively recent addition to JavaScript (introduced in ES6) and may not be supported in older browsers or environments. **Other Alternatives** If you need to access array elements, other alternatives could include: * Indexing (e.g., `arr[i]`) * Loops (e.g., `for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { ... }`) * Array methods like `forEach()` or `map()` Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on your specific use case and performance requirements. **Benchmark Preparation Code** The provided script preparation code is empty, which means that the benchmark starts with a fresh array `arr` containing 100 repeated strings. The HTML preparation code is also empty, indicating that no special HTML setup is required for this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Array join vs Math.pow
JSON.strigify vs array.join
array join vs toString js
array join('.') vs toString js
array.join(",") vs array.ToString()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?