Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
axios vs node-fetchv2.6.7
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
node-fetch vs axios
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/axios/dist/axios.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/node-fetch@2.6.7/src/index.min.js"></script>
Tests:
node-fetch
fetch('https://www.googleapis.com/discovery/v1/apis') .then(response => response.json()) .then(console.log)
axios
axios.get('https://www.googleapis.com/discovery/v1/apis') .then((response) => response.json()) .then(console.log);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
node-fetch
axios
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net! The provided JSON represents two benchmark tests: one for `node-fetch` and another for `axios`. We'll break down what's being tested, compared, and discuss the pros and cons of each approach. **What is being tested?** In both benchmarks, we're testing the performance of HTTP requests using two different libraries: `node-fetch` and `axios`. **Options being compared:** 1. **node-fetch**: This library provides a simple and modern way to make HTTP requests in Node.js. 2. **axios**: This library offers a more comprehensive set of features for making HTTP requests, including support for JSON data, headers, and cancelable requests. The main difference between the two libraries is that `node-fetch` is a simpler, lightweight implementation, while `axios` provides additional features and customization options. **Pros and Cons:** 1. **node-fetch**: * Pros: + Lightweight and efficient. + Easy to use and minimalistic API. + No dependencies or imports required. * Cons: + Limited features compared to `axios`. + May not be as robust for complex requests. 2. **axios**: * Pros: + Comprehensive set of features, including JSON data, headers, and cancelable requests. + Robust and reliable implementation. + Easy to use and intuitive API. * Cons: + More dependencies and imports required compared to `node-fetch`. + Can be overkill for simple HTTP requests. **Library usage:** In the provided benchmarks, both libraries are used in their default modes: 1. **node-fetch**: The `fetch` function is called directly, with no additional options or modifications. 2. **axios**: The `get` method is used to make a GET request, with no additional options or modifications. **Special JS features:** None of the benchmarks use any special JavaScript features or syntax. Both libraries are designed to work seamlessly with the standard JavaScript API. **Other alternatives:** If you're looking for alternative libraries for making HTTP requests in Node.js, some popular options include: 1. **curl**: A command-line tool that can be used to make HTTP requests. 2. **node-http**: A lightweight library for making HTTP requests in Node.js. 3. **reqwest**: A promise-based HTTP client for Node.js. In summary, the provided benchmarks test the performance of `node-fetch` and `axios` in making simple HTTP requests. While `node-fetch` is a lightweight and efficient option, `axios` provides a more comprehensive set of features and customization options.
Related benchmarks:
axios vs node-fetch
axios vs fetch
axios vs node-fetchV2
Fetch vs axios
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?