Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
for vs foreach vs some vs for..of non-empty array square root
(version: 0)
Compare loop performance
Comparing performance of:
for vs foreach vs some vs for..of
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var array = Array.from({length: 100}, () => Math.random());
Tests:
for
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) { console.log(array[i]^2); }
foreach
array.forEach(function(i) { console.log(i^2); });
some
array.some(function(i) { console.log(i^2); });
for..of
for (var i of array) { console.log(i^2); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
for
foreach
some
for..of
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what each test case is testing, along with their pros and cons. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark compares the performance of different loop constructs in JavaScript: 1. `for` loop 2. `forEach` loop (an iterator-based loop) 3. `some` loop (a predicate-based loop) 4. `for..of` loop (an iterator-based loop, introduced in ECMAScript 2015) **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code creates a large array of 100 random numbers using the `Array.from()` method. **Individual Test Cases** ### 1. `for` Loop This test case uses a traditional `for` loop to iterate over the array and calculate the square of each element. Pros: * Simple and well-established syntax * Easy to understand and implement Cons: * Can be slower than other options, especially for large arrays ### 2. `forEach` Loop This test case uses the `forEach()` method to iterate over the array, passing a callback function that calculates the square of each element. Pros: * Built-in method with good performance * Easy to read and maintain Cons: * Requires additional setup (the `forEach()` method is not a standard loop construct) * May incur overhead due to the callback function ### 3. `some` Loop This test case uses the `some()` method to iterate over the array, passing a predicate function that checks if each element is non-zero. Pros: * Built-in method with good performance * Can be used for more complex logic than traditional loops Cons: * Requires additional setup (the `some()` method is not a standard loop construct) * May incur overhead due to the predicate function ### 4. `for..of` Loop This test case uses the `for...of` loop to iterate over the array, accessing each element directly. Pros: * Introduced in ECMAScript 2015 for clarity and readability * Good performance compared to traditional loops Cons: * Less widely supported than other options (though becoming more common) **Library Usage** None of these test cases rely on any external libraries. They all use standard JavaScript methods and syntax. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The `for...of` loop uses a new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015, which allows for more concise iteration over arrays. **Other Alternatives** * Other loop constructs like `while`, `do-while`, and `switch` are not tested in this benchmark. * Alternative iterator-based loops, such as using `next()` and `done` events with a custom iterator, could also be used. * For more complex logic or asynchronous operations, other approaches like callbacks, promises, or async/await might be necessary. In summary, this benchmark tests the performance of four different loop constructs in JavaScript: traditional `for`, `forEach`, `some`, and `for...of` loops. It provides a good comparison of their strengths and weaknesses for iterative tasks.
Related benchmarks:
Math.sqrt(x) vs x**0.5
(x ** 0.5) vs Math.sqrt(x)
Math.pow(x,2) vs Math.sqrt(x)
x ** 0.5 vs Math.sqrt(x)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?