Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Benchmark getting file extension
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
match vs split & pop
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var fileName = "test.jpg" var regex = /\.[^\.]+$/;
Tests:
match
const fileExtension = fileName?.match(/\.[^\.]+$/)?.[0]
split & pop
const fileExtension = `.${fileName?.split('.').pop()}`;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
match
split & pop
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark measures the performance of two different approaches to get the file extension from a file name. The script preparation code provides the initial setup for the benchmark: ```javascript var fileName = "test.jpg"; var regex = /\\.[^\\.]+$/; ``` Here, `fileName` is set to `"test.jpg"` and a regular expression `regex` is defined to match the file extension. The `^` character at the start of the regular expression is a special character that matches the beginning of a string. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **"match"** ```javascript const fileExtension = fileName?.match(/\\.[^\\.]+$/)?.[0]; ``` This approach uses the `match()` method to search for the first occurrence of the regular expression in the `fileName` variable. The `?.` operator is called the "optional chaining operator", which allows us to access nested properties or methods if they exist. In this case, it's used to avoid null pointer exceptions. The `[0]` at the end of the expression returns the first captured group (the file extension) from the match result. Pros: * Simple and concise syntax * Works with non-strict modes Cons: * Can be slower due to the overhead of regular expressions * May not work as expected if `fileName` is null or undefined 2. **"split & pop"** ```javascript const fileExtension = `.${fileName?.split('.').pop()}`; ``` This approach uses the `split()` method to split the `fileName` variable into an array of substrings, and then takes the last element (`pop()` returns the last item in the array) followed by a dot (`.`). Pros: * Can be faster than regular expressions * Works even if `fileName` is null or undefined (will return an empty string) Cons: * More verbose syntax compared to the "match" approach * May not work as expected if `fileName` has multiple '.' characters **Library Usage** There are no libraries used in these test cases. **Special JS Features/Syntax** The optional chaining operator (`?.`) is a relatively new feature introduced in JavaScript (ECMAScript 2020) to safely navigate nested properties or methods. It's available in modern browsers and engines, but not in older ones. **Other Alternatives** If you need to get the file extension from a file name, other alternatives might include: * Using `fileName.split('.').pop()` without an optional chaining operator (as shown in the "split & pop" approach) * Using `fileName.replace(/^.*\./, '')` to remove everything before the last '.' character * Using a library like `path` or `fs` if you're working with Node.js and need to handle file paths Overall, the choice of approach depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preference.
Related benchmarks:
Regex vs split 2
Regex vs split 3
Regex vs split specific test
Testing regex vs split performance
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?