Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash.js vs Native isArray1212
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Native vs Lodash.js filter
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.21/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var arr = ['12', 'caca', 'maca', 'benchmark'];
Tests:
Native
Array.isArray(arr);
Lodash.js filter
_.isArray(arr);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Native
Lodash.js filter
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking setup on MeasureThat.net. The benchmark is defined by two test cases: 1. `Array.isArray(arr);` 2. `_.isArray(arr);` Both tests check whether the `arr` variable is an array using different methods. **Options being compared** In this case, there are two options being compared: * Native JavaScript implementation (`Array.isArray(arr);`) * Lodash.js implementation with a custom filter (`_.isArray(arr);`) The native JavaScript implementation uses the built-in `Array.isArray()` method to check if the variable is an array. The Lodash.js implementation, on the other hand, uses the `_isArray()` function from the Lodash library. **Pros and Cons of each approach** * Native JavaScript implementation: + Pros: Typically faster and more efficient since it's implemented in native code. + Cons: May not be as flexible or customizable as a custom implementation. * Lodash.js implementation with custom filter: + Pros: More flexible and customizable, especially for complex array checks. Can also leverage Lodash's caching mechanism to improve performance. + Cons: Slower than the native JavaScript implementation due to the overhead of calling a library function. **Lodash library** The Lodash library is a popular utility belt for JavaScript that provides various functions for tasks like array manipulation, string manipulation, and more. In this case, the `_isArray()` function is used to check if an object is an array. **Special JS feature or syntax** There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in these benchmark cases. The tests are relatively simple and straightforward. **Other alternatives** If you were to implement a custom array check using native JavaScript, you could use the `typeof` operator followed by `==` or `===` checks: ```javascript if (typeof arr === 'object' && arr !== null) { // arr is an array } ``` Another approach would be to use the `instanceof` operator to check if the variable is an instance of a native array constructor: ```javascript if (arr instanceof Array) { // arr is an array } ``` However, keep in mind that these alternatives might not be as efficient or flexible as using the built-in `Array.isArray()` method. **Benchmark preparation code** The script preparation code includes two lines: ```javascript var arr = ['12', 'caca', 'maca', 'benchmark']; ``` This creates a simple array `arr` with some sample values. The HTML preparation code links to the Lodash library using a CDN. Overall, this benchmark tests the performance of native JavaScript's `Array.isArray()` method versus the Lodash.js implementation of `_isArray()`. It provides a useful comparison for developers looking to optimize their array checks in JavaScript applications.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash.js vs Native isArray
Lodash.js vs Native ES5 vs instanceof isArray
Lodash.js vs instanceof Array
Lodash.js vs Native isArray (2023)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?