Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash IsEmpty Test
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
_.isEmpty vs length
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var arr = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
Tests:
_.isEmpty
var a = _.isEmpty(arr)
length
var a = arr?.length === 0
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
_.isEmpty
length
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help explain the JavaScript microbenchmark on MeasureThat.net. **Overview** The benchmark measures the performance of two different ways to check if an array is empty in JavaScript: 1. Using the `_.isEmpty` function from the Lodash library 2. Using a simple conditional statement `arr?.length === 0` **Lodash `.isEmpty` function** The Lodash library provides several utility functions, including `_.isEmpty`, which checks if a value is an empty object, array, or string. In this benchmark, the test case uses `_.isEmpty(arr)` to check if the input array `arr` is empty. This approach is often used in functional programming and can be more concise than writing a custom implementation. Pros: * Concise and readable code * Reduces duplication of boilerplate code Cons: * Requires including an external library (Lodash) which adds overhead * May not be suitable for all use cases where the function needs to perform additional operations **Simple Conditional Statement** The second test case uses a simple conditional statement `arr?.length === 0` to check if the input array `arr` is empty. This approach is more straightforward and doesn't require any external libraries. Pros: * Lightweight and easy to understand * No additional dependencies required Cons: * May be less concise than using a library function like `_isEmpty` * Requires explicit null checking with `?.length` **Other Considerations** Both approaches have their trade-offs. If you prioritize readability and conciseness, the Lodash `.isEmpty` function might be a good choice. However, if you're working on a project where performance is critical or you need more control over the implementation, the simple conditional statement might be a better fit. **Alternatives** Other alternatives to check if an array is empty in JavaScript include: 1. Using `Array.prototype.length === 0` directly on the array 2. Implementing a custom `isEmpty` function using a simple loop or recursive approach However, these approaches may not be as concise or readable as the Lodash `.isEmpty` function or the simple conditional statement. **Special JS Features and Syntax** In this benchmark, there are no special JavaScript features or syntax that need to be explained. The code uses standard JavaScript syntax and doesn't require any advanced features like async/await, Promises, or modern ECMAScript syntax (ES6+).
Related benchmarks:
isEmpty vs. vanilla
Lodash IsEmpty
Lodash IsEmpty hmm
isEmpty Test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?