Benchmark: Checking some stuff out

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.21/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var blah = _.times(10, n => _.random(0, 100));
blah.push(100); // Grid
blah.push(99);  // Provider

Tests:

1
let c = blah.map(v => { if (v === 100) return 100; // supposed to be return as-is if (v === 99) --v; // supposed to recursive return v + 100; });
2
let noGridElements = blah.filter(v => v !== 100); let providerChildren = noGridElements.filter(v => v === 99).map(v => --v); let validChildren = noGridElements.filter(v => v !== 99); let allChildren = validChildren.concat(providerChildren); c = allChildren.map(v => v + 100);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
1
2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, the options compared, pros and cons of each approach, and other considerations.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is a JSON object that describes the test case. It includes:

* `Name` and `Description`: metadata about the benchmark
* `Script Preparation Code`: a JavaScript code snippet that sets up the environment for the benchmark
* `Html Preparation Code`: an HTML snippet that includes a script tag referencing the Lodash library

The script preparation code uses the Lodash library (`_`) to create an array `blah` with 10 random elements between 0 and 100. It then pushes two specific values (100 and 99) onto the array.

**Individual Test Cases**

There are two test cases:

1. **Test Case 1**: The benchmark definition is a JavaScript code snippet that maps over the `blah` array. The mapping function checks if each element is equal to 100, and if so, returns 100. If not, it decrements the value by 1 (using the unary minus operator). The resulting mapped array is assigned to the variable `c`.
2. **Test Case 2**: The benchmark definition is another JavaScript code snippet that maps over the `blah` array. This time, the mapping function filters out elements that are not equal to 100 using the `filter()` method. It then applies a transformation to the filtered array by decrementing each element by 1 (again, using the unary minus operator). The resulting transformed array is concatenated with another array created by filtering and mapping over the original `blah` array.

**Options Compared**

The two test cases compare different approaches to achieving the same goal:

* Test Case 1 uses a simple mapping function that checks for equality and decrements the value by 1 if it's not equal to 100.
* Test Case 2 uses a more complex pipeline of filtering and mapping operations to achieve the same result.

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

Test Case 1 (simple mapping function):

Pros:

* Easy to understand and write
* Less overhead compared to using `filter()` and `map()`

Cons:

* May not be as efficient or scalable for large datasets

Test Case 2 (complex pipeline):

Pros:

* Can handle more complex transformations and filtering operations
* May be more efficient for large datasets, but comes with a higher overhead due to the additional function calls

Cons:

* More difficult to understand and write, especially for beginners
* May introduce performance overhead due to the repeated use of `filter()` and `map()`

**Other Considerations**

The test cases also compare how different browsers and devices handle these operations. The benchmark result shows that Chrome 96 on a Mac OS X 10.15.7 device is significantly faster than the other results, suggesting that this specific browser and hardware combination may have an advantage in terms of performance.

**Lodash Library**

The Lodash library is used to create the `blah` array with random elements. In this benchmark, it's used for its utility functions like `_times()` and `_random()`. However, in the test cases, Lodash is not actually being utilized beyond creating the initial array.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in these benchmark results. The focus seems to be on comparing different approaches to achieving a specific result.

Related benchmarks:

Checking some stuff out (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: 1 vs 2

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

1

2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):