Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
for [i,j] big/small
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
big i, small j vs small i, big j
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
big i, small j
for (let i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) { for (let j = 0; j < 10; j++) { const hi = "hi"; } }
small i, big j
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) { for (let j = 0; j < 1000000; j++) { const hi = "hi"; } }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
big i, small j
small i, big j
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what is being tested in the provided JSON benchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition specifies two different loops: 1. `for (let i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {` - This loop iterates over a large number (`1000000`) of iterations, but with only small values for the inner variable `j`, which ranges from `0` to `9`. 2. `for (let j = 0; j < 10; j++) {` - This loop iterates over a small range of values (`0` to `9`) for the outer variable `i`. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two different approaches: 1. **Large inner loop, small outer loop**: In this case, the inner loop has many iterations (1000000), but the outer loop only goes up to 10. 2. **Small inner loop, large outer loop**: Here, the inner loop has a small range of values (0-9), but the outer loop iterates over a much larger number (`1000000`). **Pros and Cons** When deciding which approach is better, we need to consider the trade-offs: * **Large inner loop with small outer loop**: + Pros: Can be faster for certain types of computations that involve a lot of repeated calculations. + Cons: May lead to slower performance due to the overhead of repeated iterations. * **Small inner loop with large outer loop**: + Pros: Can reduce the number of iterations, which can improve performance. + Cons: May lead to slower performance if the small inner loop is computationally expensive. **Other Considerations** * The use of `let` instead of `var` or no declaration for `hi` suggests that the benchmark is focusing on optimization and variable binding issues. * The const keyword is used to declare a constant string `hi`, which implies that the value doesn't change during the execution of the loop. **Libraries** The benchmark uses none, as it only consists of plain JavaScript code. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There are no special features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
for vs for each
Slowest character conversion
Lodash sort vs array.prototype.sort string
localeCompare vs function on array sort
isArray vs length (with alpha)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?