Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Ramda
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Javascript slice vs Ramda
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.1/ramda.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var animals =['ant', 'bison', 'camel', 'duck', 'elephant'];
Tests:
Javascript slice
animals.slice(2)
Ramda
R.slice(2, Infinity, animals);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Javascript slice
Ramda
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition and Script Preparation Code** The benchmark definition is provided as a JSON object that represents a JavaScript function or expression to be executed by both JavaScript and Ramda (a functional programming library for JavaScript). The script preparation code is used to set up the environment before running the benchmark. In this case, it creates an array of animal names: `animals = ['ant', 'bison', 'camel', 'duck', 'elephant'];`. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **JavaScript's built-in `slice()` method**: This is a standard JavaScript function that returns a new array containing the elements from the original array, starting at the specified index and ending at the specified index (exclusive). 2. **Ramda's `R.slice()` function**: This is a higher-order function provided by Ramda that takes an array, start index, and end index as arguments. It returns a new array with the elements from the original array, starting at the specified start index and ending before the specified end index. **Pros and Cons** **JavaScript's `slice()` method:** Pros: * Native support in all JavaScript environments. * Typically faster due to its optimized implementation. * Easy to understand and use. Cons: * May not work correctly with certain edge cases or large arrays. * Not as flexible as Ramda's `R.slice()` function, which can handle more complex scenarios. **Ramda's `R.slice()` function:** Pros: * Provides a functional programming approach that can be more predictable and easier to reason about. * Can handle more complex scenarios, such as negative start or end indices. * Allows for more flexibility in the code, enabling developers to write more concise and expressive functions. Cons: * Requires importing Ramda library, which may add extra overhead. * May have a slight performance penalty due to its functional programming nature. **Library: Ramda** Ramda is a popular JavaScript library that provides a comprehensive set of higher-order functions for functional programming. Its `R.slice()` function is designed to be more flexible and expressive than the native `slice()` method, making it suitable for tasks where a more predictable and composable approach is desired. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in this benchmark. Both options rely on standard JavaScript features, such as arrays and functions. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring other alternatives to Ramda's `R.slice()` function, you can consider using other JavaScript libraries or frameworks that provide similar functionality, such as: * Lodash: A popular utility library for JavaScript that includes a `slice` function. * Underscore.js: Another well-known utility library for JavaScript that provides an `slice` function. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics, feature sets, and licensing terms compared to Ramda.
Related benchmarks:
ramdajs contains
ramdajs contains
test ramda flatten
Lodash vs Ramda fromPairs
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?