Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
typeof repetition vs array grouping
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
typeof test vs array group test
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
typeof test
typeof B === 'undefined' || typeof C === 'undefined'
array group test
[typeof B, typeof C].every(function(elem) { return elem === 'undefined' });
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
typeof test
array group test
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to help you understand the JavaScript microbenchmark on MeasureThat.net. **What is being tested?** The benchmark is testing two different approaches to check if variables `B` and `C` are undefined: 1. Using `typeof B === 'undefined' || typeof C === 'undefined'` 2. Using `[typeof B, typeof C].every(function(elem) { return elem === 'undefined'; })` **Options being compared** The two options are comparing the performance of checking if variables are undefined using a simple `typeof` check versus an array-based check. **Pros and Cons** 1. **Simple `typeof` check**: This approach is concise and easy to read, but it may not be as efficient as other methods. It relies on the fact that `undefined` is a primitive value in JavaScript. 2. **Array-based check**: This approach creates an array with the results of `typeof B` and `typeof C`, and then uses the `every()` method to check if all elements are equal to `'undefined'`. This approach can be more efficient for larger arrays, but it may be less readable due to its use of a functional programming style. **Other considerations** * The benchmark is running on a Chrome 53 browser with an Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6 machine. * The `array group test` uses the latest JavaScript features, including template literals and the `every()` method. **Library used** There is no library being used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some browsers may have built-in optimizations for certain types of checks (e.g., `typeof`) or may use libraries like V8 (used by Chrome) to execute JavaScript code. **Special JS features** The `array group test` uses a few special JavaScript features: * Template literals (`[...].every(function(elem) { ... })`) * The `every()` method * Arrow functions (`=> ...`) These features are relatively modern and may not be supported in older browsers or environments. **Other alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to this benchmark, here are a few options: * Use a different type of check (e.g., `!!B !== !!C`) * Compare the performance of using `in` operator instead of `typeof` * Test the performance of using a custom implementation for checking if variables are undefined * Compare the performance of using a JavaScript library like Lodash or Ramda to perform checks Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be relevant to the specific use case being benchmarked, and the results may vary depending on the environment and browser being used.
Related benchmarks:
Array isArray vs instanceof 2
Array isArray vs typeof
instanceof Array vs Array.isArray
isArray vs instanceof vs typeof
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?