Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
replace regex global vs replaceAll
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
replace regex global vs replaceAll
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
replace regex global
"010-1234-5678".replace(/-/g, "");
replaceAll
"010-1234-5678".replaceAll("-", "");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
replace regex global
replaceAll
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested, along with the pros and cons of different approaches. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two string replacement methods: `replace()` (with global flag) and `replaceAll()`. Both methods are used to replace hyphens (`-`) in a given input string with an empty string. **Options Compared** 1. **`replace()` with global flag**: This method uses the `g` flag at the end of the regular expression to perform a global replacement, meaning all occurrences of the pattern are replaced. 2. **`replaceAll()`**: This method is not part of standard JavaScript, but rather a custom implementation often used in C-style languages like C or C++. It seems to be implemented as a wrapper around the `replace()` method. **Pros and Cons** 1. **`replace()` with global flag**: * Pros: Easy to use, widely supported by modern browsers. * Cons: May have performance issues due to the need for multiple iterations over the string (once per occurrence). 2. **`replaceAll()`**: * Pros: Often faster than `replace()` due to caching or optimized implementation. * Cons: Less widely supported, as it's a custom implementation that may not be recognized by all browsers. **Library and Custom Implementation** In this case, the `replaceAll()` method is implemented as a wrapper around the standard JavaScript `replace()` method. This suggests that the custom implementation is trying to mimic the behavior of C-style `replaceAll()` functions. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. It's purely focused on comparing two string replacement methods. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to test alternative approaches, some options could include: 1. Using a different replacement method, such as `regex.replace()` with the `g` flag (a more modern and widely supported approach). 2. Testing performance using native JavaScript methods like `Array.prototype.map()` or `String.prototype.split()`. 3. Comparing the performance of custom implementations written in other languages, such as C++ or Rust. Keep in mind that each alternative would require a separate benchmark setup and results interpretation. I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
replaceAll vs regex DbSgf435
replaceAll vs regex replace (no prep code)
Global regex replace vs replaceAll
replaceAll native 2023 vs regex replace
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?