Benchmark: Map or Reduce or Lodash GroupBy Rf

Script Preparation code:

var MAX_SAFE_INTEGER = 9007199254740991

function arrayReduce(array, iteratee, accumulator, initAccum) {
  let index = -1
  const length = array == null ? 0 : array.length

  if (initAccum && length) {
    accumulator = array[++index]
  }
  while (++index < length) {
    accumulator = iteratee(accumulator, array[index], index, array)
  }
  return accumulator
}


function baseFor(object, iteratee, keysFunc) {
  const iterable = Object(object)
  const props = keysFunc(object)
  let { length } = props
  let index = -1

  while (length--) {
    const key = props[++index]
    if (iteratee(iterable[key], key, iterable) === false) {
      break
    }
  }
  return object
}

function isLength(value) {
  return typeof value === 'number' &&
    value > -1 && value % 1 == 0 && value <= MAX_SAFE_INTEGER
}

function isArrayLike(value) {
  return value != null && typeof value !== 'function' && isLength(value.length)
}


function baseForOwn(object, iteratee) {
  return object && baseFor(object, iteratee, keys)
}


function baseEach(collection, iteratee) {
  if (collection == null) {
    return collection
  }
  if (!isArrayLike(collection)) {
    return baseForOwn(collection, iteratee)
  }
  const length = collection.length
  const iterable = Object(collection)
  let index = -1

  while (++index < length) {
    if (iteratee(iterable[index], index, iterable) === false) {
      break
    }
  }
  return collection
}


function baseReduce(collection, iteratee, accumulator, initAccum, eachFunc) {
  eachFunc(collection, (value, index, collection) => {
    accumulator = initAccum
      ? (initAccum = false, value)
      : iteratee(accumulator, value, index, collection)
  })
  return accumulator
}


function reduce(collection, iteratee, accumulator) {
  const func = Array.isArray(collection) ? arrayReduce : baseReduce
  const initAccum = arguments.length < 3
  return func(collection, iteratee, accumulator, initAccum, baseEach)
}


var hasOwnProperty = Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty

function baseAssignValue(object, key, value) {
  if (key == '__proto__') {
    Object.defineProperty(object, key, {
      'configurable': true,
      'enumerable': true,
      'value': value,
      'writable': true
    })
  } else {
    object[key] = value
  }
}

function groupBy(collection, iteratee) {
  return reduce(collection, (result, value, key) => {
    key = iteratee(value)
    if (hasOwnProperty.call(result, key)) {
      result[key].push(value)
    } else {
      baseAssignValue(result, key, [value])
    }
    return result
  }, {})
}

var n = 730;
var arr = [...Array(n)].map((_) => Math.random() * 10);

Tests:

gp
const lm = groupBy(arr, Math.floor)
map
const m = new Map(); for (const v of arr) { const k = Math.floor(v); const temp = m.get(k) ?? []; temp.push(v); m.set(k, temp) }
reduce
const rm = arr.reduce((acc, v) => { const k = Math.floor(v); (acc[k] || (acc[k] = [])).push(v) return acc; }, {})

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
gp
map
reduce

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:147.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/147.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 147 on Mac OS X 10.15

View result in a separate tab

240K/s

reduce

113K/s

map

73K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ gp	240,293 Ops/sec
reduce	113,069 Ops/sec
map	72,987 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll explain the benchmark and its components.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark is defined by two scripts: one for preparation code and another for HTML preparation code (which is null in this case). The script is a JavaScript function that creates an array of random numbers, groups them using either `groupBy` or `map`, or reduces them to a single object with grouped values.

**Test Cases**

There are three test cases:

1. **gp**: This test case uses the `groupBy` function from Lodash to group the array of random numbers by their floor value.
2. **map**: This test case uses the `Map` data structure in JavaScript to achieve similar grouping as `gp`.
3. **reduce**: This test case uses the `reduce` method on the array of random numbers, grouping the values based on their floor.

**Libraries and Functions**

* **Lodash**: A popular JavaScript library that provides various utility functions, including `groupBy`. In this benchmark, Lodash is used for the `groupBy` function.
* **Map**: The built-in JavaScript data structure used in the `map` test case. It's a hash table-like object that allows efficient key-value pairs.

**Options Compared**

In each test case, the following options are compared:

* **groupBy vs map**: These two approaches use different data structures to group the array of random numbers.
	+ Pros:
		- `groupBy`: More concise and expressive syntax using Lodash's `groupBy` function. It's also more flexible with its callback function.
		- `map`: Uses a standard JavaScript feature, making it more accessible to developers familiar with other languages.
	+ Cons:
		- `groupBy`: Requires an external library (Lodash) for the `groupBy` function.
		- `map`: May be less efficient due to the overhead of creating and managing a Map data structure.
* **reduce vs map**: These two approaches use different methods to achieve grouping.
	+ Pros:
		- `reduce`: A standard JavaScript method that's more concise and expressive. It also allows for more control over the iteration process.
		- `map`: Uses a more straightforward approach with a callback function.
	+ Cons:
		- `reduce`: May be less readable due to the nested callbacks.

**Benchmark Results**

The latest benchmark results show the execution times per second for each test case:

* **gp**: 8939.0654296875 executions per second
* **reduce**: 5953.35498046875 executions per second
* **map**: 6857.54443359375 executions per second

These results suggest that `groupBy` is the fastest approach, followed by `map`, and then `reduce`. However, please note that these results may vary depending on the specific use case and environment.

Map or Reduce or Lodash GroupBy Rf (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Map or Reduce or Lodash GroupBy Rf

Comparing performance of: `gp vs map vs reduce`

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

gp

map

reduce

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Map or Reduce or Lodash GroupBy Rf (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Map or Reduce or Lodash GroupBy Rf

Comparing performance of: gp vs map vs reduce

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

gp

map

reduce

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Comparing performance of: `gp vs map vs reduce`