Benchmark: Map Solution - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

objectives = [
    {
      "index": 1,
      "name": "obj1",
      "unit": "unit1",
      "type": "Maximize",
      "target": null,
      "bounds": [0, 100],
      "weight": 1,
      "minimize": false
    },
    {
      "index": 2,
      "name": "obj2",
      "unit": "unit2",
      "type": "Minimize",
      "target": null,
      "bounds": [0, 100],
      "weight": 1,
      "minimize": true
    },
    {
      "index": 3,
      "name": "obj3",
      "unit": "unit3",
      "type": "Approximate",
      "target": 50,
      "bounds": [0, 100],
      "weight": 1,
      "minimize": false
    }
  ],

editedObjective = {
      "index": 3,
      "name": "obj3",
      "unit": "unit3",
      "type": "Approximate",
      "target": 50,
      "bounds": [0, 100],
      "weight": 1,
      "minimize": false
    }

Tests:

Map Solution
objectives = objectives.map((objective) => ( objective.index !== editedObjective.index ? objective : editedObjective ));
findIndex solution
const objectivePosition = objectives.findIndex( (objective) => objective.index === editedObjective.index, ); // eslint-disable-next-line no-param-reassign objectives[objectivePosition] = editedObjective;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Map Solution
findIndex solution

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Related benchmarks:

Map Solution (version: 0)

Code with map solution

Comparing performance of: Map Solution vs findIndex solution

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Map Solution

findIndex solution

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results