Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
forEach concat vs reduce push performance
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
forEach concat vs Reduce push
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
forEach concat
const a = [...Array(1000)].map(() => ({ nested: Array.from({length: 40}, () => Math.floor(Math.random() * 40)) })); let b = []; a.forEach((item) => { b = b.concat(item.nested); });
Reduce push
const a = [...Array(1000)].map(() => ({ nested: Array.from({length: 40}, () => Math.floor(Math.random() * 40)) })); const b = a.reduce((acc, item) => { acc.push(...item.nested); return acc }, []);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
forEach concat
Reduce push
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is tested, compared options, pros and cons, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark measures the performance of two approaches: `forEach` with concatenation (`b = b.concat(item.nested);`) and `reduce` with a push operation (`acc.push(...item.nested)`). **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **forEach concat**: This test case uses the `forEach` method to iterate over an array of objects, where each object has a nested array of 40 random elements. The `concat` method is used to add each nested array to the main array `b`. 2. **Reduce push**: This test case uses the `reduce` method to iterate over the same array of objects and accumulate the nested arrays in a single array `b`. The `push` operation is used to add elements to the accumulator `acc`, which is eventually returned as the final result. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: * **forEach concat**: This approach uses the `concat` method to add elements to the main array `b`. It can lead to performance issues due to the overhead of creating new arrays and concatenating them. * **Reduce push**: This approach uses the `reduce` method with a push operation to accumulate the nested arrays in a single array. It is generally considered more efficient than `forEach concat` because it avoids the overhead of creating new arrays. **Pros and Cons** * **forEach concat**: + Pros: Simple and easy to understand. + Cons: Can be slow due to the overhead of concatenating arrays. * **Reduce push**: + Pros: Generally faster and more efficient than `forEach concat`. + Cons: May be less intuitive for developers who are not familiar with the `reduce` method. **Library** The test case uses no external libraries. It only relies on built-in JavaScript methods (`forEach`, `map`, `Array.from`) to execute the benchmark. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark that requires specific knowledge of ES6+ features or async/await. **Other Alternatives** If you were to compare these two approaches, you might also consider: * **forEach map**: Instead of using `concat`, you could use the `map` method to create a new array with the concatenated elements. This approach would be similar to `reduce push`. * **Array.prototype.push.apply()**: Instead of using `push` in the `reduce` callback, you could use the `apply()` method to call `push()` on the accumulator array. Keep in mind that the performance differences between these approaches will depend on the specific use case and browser/JS engine. **Benchmarking Considerations** When benchmarking JavaScript code, it's essential to consider the following factors: * **Sampling**: Ensure that your benchmark is representative of the expected usage patterns. * **Warm-up**: Make sure that your benchmark has enough warm-up iterations to reflect the actual performance characteristics of the code. * **Overhead**: Account for any additional overhead, such as memory allocation or garbage collection, that may impact performance. * **Benchmarking libraries**: Choose a reliable and well-maintained benchmarking library that can handle the specifics of JavaScript execution.
Related benchmarks:
Array concat vs spread operator vs push - with large arrays6
forEach concat vs reduce push vs forEach push vs reduce concat performance
forEach concat vs reduce push vs forEach push vs reduce concat performance test
forEach concat vs reduce push vs forEach push vs reduce concat performance test 2
array spread operator vs concat vs push fix
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?