Benchmark: benchmark-x - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script type="module">
    import dayjs from "https://cdn.skypack.dev/dayjs@1.10.7"
    import * as luxon from "https://cdn.skypack.dev/luxon@2.3.0"
    import * as dateFns from "https://cdn.skypack.dev/date-fns@v2.28.0"
    import moment from "https://cdn.skypack.dev/moment@2.29.1"
    window.dayjs = dayjs
    window.dateFns = dateFns
    window.moment = moment
    window.luxon = luxon
</script>

Script Preparation code:

window.ds = "2022-01-12T00:51:53.623839+00:00";

Tests:

datefns
dateFns.add(new Date(ds), { days: 5 }).toISOString()
luxon
luxon.DateTime.fromISO(ds).plus({ days: 5 }).toISO()
moment
moment(ds).add(5, 'days').toISOString()
dayjs
dayjs(ds).add(5, "day").toISOString()
native
((dt) => dt.setDate(dt.getDate() + 5) && dt.toISOString())(new Date(ds))

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
datefns
luxon
moment
dayjs
native

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case created on the MeasureThat.net website.

**Benchmark Purpose:**
This benchmark compares the performance of different date and time manipulation libraries in JavaScript, namely:

1. `luxon`
2. `date-fns`
3. `moment`
4. A native JavaScript implementation

The primary goal is to measure the execution speed and throughput of each library when performing simple date arithmetic operations.

**Library Options:**
Each test case uses a specific library to perform the same operation, which is adding 5 days to a given date (`ds`). The libraries used are:

1. `luxon`: A modern JavaScript library for working with dates and times.
2. `date-fns`: A utility-first library for working with dates in JavaScript.
3. `moment`: A popular JavaScript library for manipulating dates and times.
4. Native JavaScript implementation: A simple, built-in function to perform date arithmetic.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach:**

1. **luxon**: Pros:
	* Modern architecture with a focus on simplicity and readability.
	* Supports various date formats and time zones.
	* Performance is generally good due to its optimized algorithms.
Cons:
	* May have a steeper learning curve for those unfamiliar with the library.
2. `date-fns`: Pros:
	* High level of customization and flexibility.
	* Well-documented and widely adopted in the community.
	* Supports various date formats and time zones.
Cons:
	* Can be slower than optimized native JavaScript implementations due to its utility-first approach.
3. `moment`: Pros:
	* Wide adoption and a large community of developers who contribute to it.
	* Easy to learn and use, especially for those familiar with the library.
Cons:
	* Has been criticized for being slow and memory-intensive compared to other libraries.
4. **Native JavaScript implementation**: Pros:
	* Optimized for performance due to being built-in code.
	* Fast execution speed and low memory usage.
Cons:
	* Less flexible than third-party libraries, requiring manual date manipulation.

**Considerations:**
The benchmark focuses on simple date arithmetic operations, which might not accurately represent real-world use cases. More complex scenarios or edge cases may require additional optimizations or trade-offs in library choice. Additionally, the performance differences between these libraries can vary depending on specific requirements and constraints of the project.

**Other Alternatives:**
There are other JavaScript libraries for date and time manipulation, such as:

1. `day.js` (not explicitly mentioned in the benchmark)
2. `js-joda`
3. `core-js`: Includes a set of polyfills for various modern JavaScript features, including date manipulation.
4. **V8's built-in Date implementation**: Some developers might be interested in exploring V8's built-in date handling, although this is less common due to its potential lack of customization and flexibility.

These alternatives may offer different trade-offs between performance, ease of use, and feature sets, depending on the specific requirements of the project.

Related benchmarks:

benchmark-x (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: datefns vs luxon vs moment vs dayjs vs native

Created: 4 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

datefns

luxon

moment

dayjs

native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):