Benchmark: Get values from object

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="lodash.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var value = {a: 'a', b: 'b', c: 'c'};

Tests:

Lodash
_.values(value)
Native
Object.values(value)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash
Native

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of getting values from an object using two different approaches:

1. **_.values(value)** (using Lodash library)
2. **Object.values(value)** (native JavaScript approach)

Both approaches aim to retrieve an array of values from an object, but they differ in their implementation.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares the performance of two options:

1. Using the Lodash `values()` function, which is a utility function that returns an array of values from an object.
2. Using the native JavaScript `Object.values()` method, which is a built-in method that also returns an array of values from an object.

**Pros and Cons**

### _.values(value)

Pros:

* Familiarity: Lodash is a well-known library that provides a wide range of utility functions, including `values()`.
* Reusability: Using a library like Lodash can simplify the code and reduce duplication.
* Flexibility: Lodash provides various options for customizing the behavior of `values()`.

Cons:

* Performance overhead: Including an external library adds overhead due to loading and parsing the JavaScript file.
* Dependency on Lodash: The benchmark relies on Lodash being available in the test environment, which might not be the case everywhere.

### Object.values(value)

Pros:

* Native implementation: Using a built-in method like `Object.values()` is often faster since it's implemented in native code.
* No dependencies: This approach doesn't require any external libraries or files to be loaded.

Cons:

* Less familiar: The `Object.values()` method might be less well-known than Lodash's `values()`, which could lead to unfamiliarity with the implementation details.

**Library and Purpose**

The library used in this benchmark is Lodash. It's a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functions for tasks like string manipulation, object manipulation, and more. The `values()` function is part of Lodash's "Utility Functions" module and returns an array of values from an object.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition. Both approaches use standard JavaScript constructs (arrays, objects, functions) to achieve their goals.

**Other Considerations**

When writing benchmarks, it's essential to consider factors like:

* Consistency: Ensure that the test environment is consistent across all runs and machines.
* Variability: Account for variability in system configurations, network conditions, and other external factors.
* Repeatability: Make sure the benchmark is repeatable to ensure reliable results.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives for this type of benchmark might include:

* Measuring the performance of a specific framework or library (e.g., React, Angular).
* Comparing different caching mechanisms or optimization techniques.
* Evaluating the impact of algorithmic changes on performance.

By exploring these alternative benchmarks, you can gain a deeper understanding of the trade-offs involved in different approaches and make more informed decisions about your own projects.

Related benchmarks:

Get values from object (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash vs Native

Created: 4 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Lodash

Native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):