Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
loop test 3274623654762355
(version: 0)
loop test
Comparing performance of:
for loop (reverse noop) vs while loop
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
for loop (reverse noop)
let acts = "BRA|BRA|FLR|VSL|BRA".split("|"); for (let i = acts.length - 1; i >= 0; --i) { if (acts[i] == "BRA") acts.splice(i, 1); }
while loop
let acts = "BRA|BRA|FLR|VSL|BRA".split("|"); let i = acts.length; while (i--) { if (acts[i] == "BRA") acts.splice(i, 1); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
for loop (reverse noop)
while loop
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the provided benchmark and its different approaches. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test, where users can create and run small code snippets to measure their performance. The test is designed to compare the execution speed of two loops: for loop (with reverse operation) and while loop. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code section is empty in both benchmark definitions. This suggests that the JavaScript engine is responsible for preparing the code, including parsing, optimization, and compilation. **Loop Comparisons** There are two test cases: 1. **For Loop (Reverse Noop)** This test case uses a traditional for loop with an incrementing index (`i`) that decrements from the last element of the array to the first. The loop removes elements with a specific string value ("BRA") using the `splice` method. Pros: * Easy to understand and implement. * Suitable for small arrays. Cons: * May suffer from slower performance due to the overhead of incrementing and decrementing indices. * May not be as efficient as other loop alternatives. 2. **While Loop** This test case uses a while loop with an decrementing index (`i`) that decrements from the last element of the array to the first. The loop removes elements with a specific string value ("BRA") using the `splice` method. Pros: * May be faster than the for loop due to reduced overhead of incrementing and decrementing indices. * Suitable for large arrays. Cons: * Can be less intuitive for developers familiar with for loops. * May require more careful handling of edge cases (e.g., array length changes). **Library Usage** In both test cases, a library is not explicitly used. However, the `splice` method is used to remove elements from the array, which is a built-in JavaScript method. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There is no special JS feature or syntax used in these test cases. They rely on basic JavaScript syntax and built-in methods. **Alternative Approaches** Other loop alternatives that could be compared in this benchmark include: 1. **Array.reduce()**: A more concise way to perform reduction operations using an accumulator. 2. **Array.prototype.filter()**: A built-in method for filtering elements from an array, which can be used instead of removing elements with `splice`. 3. **Array.prototype.forEach()** or **Array.prototypeforEach()**: Iterative methods that allow developers to execute a callback function on each element of the array without modifying it. 4. **Async iteration**: Using async/await or promises to iterate over arrays, which can be beneficial for large datasets. These alternative approaches may offer different performance characteristics and are worth considering when optimizing loop-based code in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
Powers of two
Increment/decrement operator in condition vs. code block of while loop
for loop vs every
var vs let vs const loopy
cycle speed
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?