Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
string equality - ramda equals vs equal operator
(version: 0)
compare ramda equals and compare operator on string
Comparing performance of:
Ramda vs equal operator
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var a = 'i am a string'; var b = 'i am a string';
Tests:
Ramda
var result = R.equals(a, b)
equal operator
var result = a === b
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Ramda
equal operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark. **What is being tested?** The benchmark compares the performance of two string equality checks: 1. `R.equals(a, b)`: This uses the Ramda library to perform an equality check on strings `a` and `b`. 2. `a === b`: This is a native JavaScript operator that performs an equality check on strings `a` and `b`. **Options compared** The two options being compared are: * **Ramda's `equals` function**: A higher-order function from the Ramda library that takes two arguments and returns a boolean indicating whether they are equal. * **Native JavaScript `===` operator**: A built-in operator in JavaScript that checks for equality between two values. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: **Ramda's `equals` function:** Pros: * More explicit and expressive than the native `===` operator * Can handle more complex data structures, such as arrays and objects Cons: * Slower due to the additional function call overhead * Requires importing an external library (in this case, Ramda) **Native JavaScript `===` operator:** Pros: * Faster since it's a built-in operation without function call overhead * More straightforward and concise Cons: * Less explicit and less expressive than `equals` * May not work as expected for certain data structures (e.g., null or undefined values) **Library used - Ramda** Ramda is a popular functional programming library for JavaScript. Its `equals` function is specifically designed to perform equality checks on values, including strings. **Special JS feature - No special features are mentioned in this benchmark** If you'd like to know more about other libraries or approaches that can be used for string equality checks in JavaScript, I can provide some alternatives and their characteristics. Some popular alternatives include: * Lodash's `isEqual` function * Moment.js's `equals` function (specifically designed for date and time comparisons) * Built-in String.prototype.equals() method (supported by Internet Explorer 11 and later) Let me know if you'd like more information on these alternatives!
Related benchmarks:
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with Ramda assoc
Ramda (0.26.0) mergeRight vs spread
ramda safeToString vs. JSON.stringify
nested string equality - ramda equals vs equal operator
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?