Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator v2
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional slice() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.slice
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = params.slice();
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.slice
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and analyzed. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is comparing two approaches to create a copy of an array in JavaScript: 1. `Array.prototype.slice()` 2. The ES6 spread operator (`[ ...params ]`) **Options Compared** The test cases are designed to compare the performance of these two methods on different inputs. By using identical input data (an array with 3 elements: a string, a boolean, and an integer), we can isolate the impact of each method. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. `Array.prototype.slice()` * Pros: + Widely supported across JavaScript versions and browsers. + Well-known and easily understood by developers. * Cons: + Can be slower than other methods, especially for large arrays. + May allocate additional memory for the new array. 2. ES6 Spread Operator (`[ ...params ]`) * Pros: + More concise and expressive syntax. + Often faster than `slice()` due to its ability to avoid creating a new array. * Cons: + Requires modern JavaScript versions (ES6+) and browsers that support it. + May not work as expected in older browsers or environments. **Library Used** In this benchmark, no libraries are explicitly mentioned. However, the ES6 spread operator relies on the `Array.prototype spread` method, which is a built-in feature of modern JavaScript engines. This suggests that the test is designed to run in relatively modern browsers and environments. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The ES6 spread operator (`[ ...params ]`) is a new syntax introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows for more concise array creation by spreading an existing array or iterable into a new one. This feature is widely supported across modern JavaScript engines and browsers. **Other Alternatives** In addition to the `slice()` method and the ES6 spread operator, other approaches can be used to create array copies in JavaScript: * `Array.prototype.concat()`: Creates a new array by concatenating an existing array with another array or value. * `Array.prototype.map()`: Returns a new array containing the results of applying a provided function to each element in the original array. * `Array.prototype.reduce()`: Applies a reducing function to each element in the array, returning a single output value. While these alternatives are valid ways to create array copies, they might not always be as efficient or concise as using `slice()` or the spread operator. The benchmark is focused on comparing these two specific methods, but understanding other approaches can help developers choose the best solution for their use cases.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator.
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator With slightly bigger array
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator on a bigger array
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator - large array 100000
Array.prototype.slice vs spread operator performance
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?