Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
MyMy Spread vs Concat
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Spread Op vs Concat
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Spread Op
const a = ['se', 'fi', 'no', 'dk', 'nl', 'de', 'at', 'be', 'fr', 'pl'] const b = ['us', 'uk', 'au', 'es', 'it', 'ca', 'nz', 'pt', 'ie'] const c = [...a, ...b]
Concat
const a = ['se', 'fi', 'no', 'dk', 'nl', 'de', 'at', 'be', 'fr', 'pl'] const b = ['us', 'uk', 'au', 'es', 'it', 'ca', 'nz', 'pt', 'ie'] const c = [].concat(a, b)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Spread Op
Concat
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Measuring the performance of JavaScript operations is crucial in understanding the efficiency of various approaches and identifying potential bottlenecks in code. **Benchmark Definition:** The provided benchmark definition consists of two test cases: 1. **Spread Operator (...)**: This approach uses the spread operator to concatenate arrays `a` and `b`. The syntax `c = [...a, ...b]` creates a new array by spreading the elements of `a` and `b`. 2. **Concatenation using Array.prototype.concat()**: This approach uses the `concat()` method to concatenate arrays `a` and `b`. The syntax `c = [].concat(a, b)` returns a new array with the elements of `a` and `b`. **Options Compared:** The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: * **Spread Operator (...)**: This approach is more concise and expressive but can be slower due to the overhead of creating a new array. * **Concatenation using Array.prototype.concat()**: This approach is more traditional and widely supported, but its syntax can be less readable. **Pros and Cons:** * **Spread Operator (...)** * Pros: * More concise and expressive * Can be faster for large arrays due to the use of a native operation * Cons: * Can be slower due to the overhead of creating a new array * **Concatenation using Array.prototype.concat()** * Pros: * More traditional and widely supported * Can be faster for small arrays or when performance is critical * Cons: * Less concise and expressive * Can be slower due to the use of a method call **Library and Purpose:** There are no libraries used in this benchmark. However, if we consider the `Array.prototype.concat()` method, it's part of the ECMAScript standard and is implemented by most JavaScript engines. **Special JS Feature or Syntax:** The benchmark uses the spread operator (`...`), which was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). The syntax allows for more concise array creation and has become a popular choice among developers. **Other Alternatives:** Alternative approaches to concatenating arrays include: * Using `Array.prototype.push()` with an array as an argument, like this: `[...a, ...b].push(...a, ...b)`. This approach is less efficient than the spread operator but can be more readable. * Using a library or function that provides a custom concatenation method, such as Lodash's `concatAll()`. * Using a different data structure, like an array of objects, to avoid array concatenation altogether. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different trade-offs in terms of performance, readability, and maintainability.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
ES6 Array concat vs spread operator
Array concat vs spread operator vs push v2
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator 12
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?