Benchmark: lodash mapValues

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

users = {
   'fred':    { 'user': 'fred',    'age': 40 },
   'pebbles': { 'user': 'pebbles', 'age': 1 }
};

Tests:

Lodash
_.mapValues(users, ({ age }) => age);
Native reduce
const keys = _.keys(users); keys.reduce((acc, key) => { acc[key] = users[key].age; return acc; }, {});
native for
const keys = _.keys(users); const len = keys.length; const result = {}; for (let index = 0; index < len; index++) { result[keys[index]] = users[keys[index]].age; }
native forEach
const keys = _.keys(users); const result = {}; keys.forEach(key => { result[key] = users[key].age; });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash
Native reduce
native for
native forEach

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:136.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/136.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 136 on Mac OS X 10.15

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash	12490886.0 Ops/sec
Native reduce	13881254.0 Ops/sec
native for	15034309.0 Ops/sec
native forEach	14098987.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON benchmark definition and explain what is being tested.

**Overview**

The benchmark is testing the performance of four different approaches to iterate over an object and extract values:

1. **Lodash**: Using the `_.mapValues` function from Lodash, a popular JavaScript utility library.
2. **Native Reduce**: Using the built-in `reduce` method on an array of keys.
3. **Native For Loop**: Using a traditional `for` loop to iterate over the keys and extract values.
4. **Native ForEach Loop**: Using the `forEach` method to iterate over the keys.

**Options being compared**

The benchmark is comparing the performance of these four approaches:

* Lodash's `_.mapValues` function
* Built-in `reduce` method on an array of keys
* Traditional `for` loop
* `forEach` method

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons for each approach:

1. **Lodash**: Pros:
	* Concise and readable code
	* Can be faster than native methods due to optimized implementation
Cons:
	* Adds dependency on Lodash library, which may not be desirable in all cases
	* May have additional overhead due to the need to load the Lodash library
2. **Native Reduce**: Pros:
	* Fast and efficient, since it's a built-in method
	* Does not add any additional dependencies or overhead
Cons:
	* Requires extra work to create an array of keys
	* May not be as readable or concise as Lodash code
3. **Native For Loop**: Pros:
	* Familiar and easy to understand for many developers
	* Does not require creating an array of keys
Cons:
	* Can be slower due to the overhead of the loop
	* Requires more code and may be less readable than other approaches
4. **Native ForEach Loop**: Pros:
	* Similar to traditional `for` loop, but with a more modern syntax
	* Does not require creating an array of keys
Cons:
	* May be slower due to the overhead of the loop
	* Less familiar for some developers

**Library and its purpose**

In this benchmark, Lodash is used as a utility library that provides a `_.mapValues` function. This function takes an object and returns a new object with values mapped from the original object.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark.

**Other alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are some options:

* Using `Object.entries()` and `reduce()` to iterate over an object's entries
* Using a `Map` data structure to store keys and values
* Using a functional programming approach with `map()`, `filter()`, and `reduce()`

Related benchmarks:

lodash mapValues (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash vs Native reduce vs native for vs native forEach

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Lodash

Native reduce

native for

native forEach

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):