Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
React-Combo-Hello
(version: 0)
Benchmark creating a component that writes "Hello world" to the page.
Comparing performance of:
React vs Combo.js
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id="container"></div> <script src="https://cdn.rawgit.com/combojs/combo-js/0.1.0/dist/combo.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.6.1/react.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.6.1/react-dom.min.js"></script>
Tests:
React
class Hello extends React.Component { render() { return React.createElement('div', null, `Hello ${this.props.name}`); } } ReactDOM.render( React.createElement(Hello, {name: 'World'}, null), document.getElementById('container') );
Combo.js
var Test = new class extends Combo.Component { render(props) { return `<div>Hello ${props.name}</div>`; } }("container"); Combo.render(Test, {name: "World"});
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
React
Combo.js
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Overview** MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark, "React-Combo-Hello", tests the performance of two different JavaScript libraries: React and Combo.js. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code includes the following lines: * A CDN link for Combo.js (version 0.1.0) * Two CDN links for React (version 15.6.1): + react.min.js + react-dom.min.js This suggests that the benchmark is using a combination of both libraries to create a simple "Hello world" component. **Individual Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **React**: This test case uses the React library to create a `Hello` component, which renders a `div` element with the text "Hello World". The component is then rendered to the page using ReactDOM. 2. **Combo.js**: This test case uses the Combo.js library to create a `Test` component, which also renders a `div` element with the text "Hello World". However, instead of using JSX, Combo.js uses a templating syntax (`<div>Hello ${props.name}</div>`). **Library Descriptions** * **React**: React is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces. It provides a declarative syntax (JSX) and an efficient virtual DOM that helps to optimize rendering and updates. * **Combo.js**: Combo.js is a lightweight, templating-based JavaScript framework that aims to simplify the creation of web applications. **Comparison of Options** The two test cases compare the performance of React and Combo.js in creating a simple "Hello world" component. The comparison options are: * **React**: Uses JSX for declarative syntax and ReactDOM for rendering. + Pros: Easy to learn and use, efficient virtual DOM, widely adopted ecosystem. + Cons: Steeper learning curve compared to Combo.js, may require more setup and configuration. * **Combo.js**: Uses a templating syntax (`<div>Hello ${props.name}</div>`). + Pros: Lightweight, easy to learn and use, no JSX or ReactDOM required. + Cons: Less widely adopted ecosystem, may be less performant than React. **Other Considerations** * **Browser Compatibility**: The benchmark result shows that both Chrome 71 on a Mac OS X 10.14.2 device performed well, but the React test case had higher execution counts per second. * **Device Platform and Operating System**: The benchmark was run on a desktop device with a specific operating system (Mac OS X 10.14.2). * **Test Name**: The test name indicates that this is a microbenchmark for measuring performance. **Alternatives** Other alternatives to React and Combo.js could include: * Other JavaScript libraries or frameworks, such as Angular, Vue.js, or Ember.js. * WebAssembly (WASM) based solutions for creating fast and efficient web applications. * Native mobile or desktop applications built with languages like Swift, Kotlin, or C++. However, the specific context of this benchmark is limited to testing the performance of React and Combo.js in creating a simple "Hello world" component.
Related benchmarks:
jQuery vs Umbrella JS SetText Speed Test
jQuery vs Vanilla JS SetText Speed Test (not slim)
Elemint vs... (Lookup)
Vanilla, Bliss, Umbrella - JS Library Performance Test
Vanilla vs Cash vs Bliss vs jQuery JS Library Speed Test 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?