Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
test push and =
(version: 0)
23
Comparing performance of:
123 vs 232
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
let newData = [] const data = [1,2,3,4,5] for(let i=0;i<data.length;i++){ newData.push(data[i]) }
Tests:
123
let newData = [] const data = [1,2,3,4,5] for(let i=0;i<data.length;i++){ newData.push(data[i]) }
232
let newData = [] const data = [1,2,3,4,5] for(let i=0;i<data.length;i++){ newData[i] = data[i]; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
123
232
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmarking JSON and explain what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The provided `Script Preparation Code` represents a JavaScript snippet that creates an array `data` with five elements, then pushes each element into a new array `newData`. ```javascript let newData = []; const data = [1,2,3,4,5]; for (let i=0; i<data.length; i++) { newData.push(data[i]); } ``` This benchmark tests the performance of pushing elements onto an array in JavaScript. **Options compared** There are two options being compared: 1. **`newData.push(data[i])`**: This is a simple and straightforward way to push each element from `data` into `newData`. 2. **`newData[i] = data[i];`**: This approach uses the assignment operator (`=`) to assign each element of `data` to the corresponding index in `newData`. **Pros and Cons** 1. **Simple Push**: The first approach is easy to read and write, but it may not be as efficient due to the overhead of a function call. 2. **Assignment Operator**: The second approach uses the assignment operator, which can be more efficient since it eliminates the need for a function call. However, this approach assumes that the indices are numeric, which might not always be the case. **Library and Special JS Feature** There is no specific library mentioned in the benchmarking JSON. However, note that using `let` declarations (e.g., `let newData`, `const data`) is a modern JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). **Other Considerations** The benchmark seems to be comparing the performance of two simple array operations. In real-world scenarios, you might encounter more complex use cases that require additional considerations, such as: * Array resizing or reallocation * Index shifting or invalidation * Array iteration and indexing using `for...of` loops **Alternatives** Other alternatives for benchmarking JavaScript array operations include: 1. **Creating a large array**: Instead of pushing individual elements into an array, create a larger array with many elements and measure the time it takes to push those elements. 2. **Using a streaming library**: Utilize libraries like `stream` or `pump` that provide efficient streaming APIs for handling data in chunks, reducing memory allocation and deallocation overhead. 3. **Measuring JavaScript engine optimizations**: Benchmark specific JavaScript engine optimizations, such as just-in-time (JIT) compilation or garbage collection, to understand their performance impact on array operations. Keep in mind that the specific approach and alternatives used will depend on the context and requirements of your project.
Related benchmarks:
Array immutability vs mutability
Array slice vs for loop
forEach vs Spread 2021
slice vs. for
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?