Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Fastest way to find keys in objects
(version: 0)
Fastest way to find keys in objects
Comparing performance of:
undefined vs hasOwnProperty vs in
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
source = { a: 1, b: 2, c: 3, d: 4, e: 5, f: 6, g: 7, h: 8, }; target = { a: 1, b: 2, d: 4, e: 5, f: 6, i: 9, j: 10, };
Tests:
undefined
for (const sourceKey in source) { if (target[sourceKey] === undefined) { delete target.sourceKey; } }
hasOwnProperty
for (const sourceKey in source) { if (!target.hasOwnProperty(sourceKey)) { delete target.sourceKey; } }
in
for (const sourceKey in source) { if (!(sourceKey in target)) { delete target.sourceKey; } }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
undefined
hasOwnProperty
in
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:138.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/138.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 138 on Ubuntu
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
undefined
13626743.0 Ops/sec
hasOwnProperty
10824985.0 Ops/sec
in
14061618.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark aims to find the fastest way to remove keys from an object in JavaScript. It uses two predefined objects, `source` and `target`, which contain various key-value pairs. **Options Compared** Three different approaches are compared: 1. **`in` operator**: This approach checks if a key is present in the object using the `in` operator. If the key is not found, it attempts to delete the non-existent key from the target object. 2. **`hasOwnProperty` method**: This approach uses the `hasOwnProperty` method of the object to check if a property (key) exists. If the key is not found, it attempts to delete the non-existent key from the target object using `delete`. 3. **`undefined` check**: This approach simply checks if the value associated with a key in the source object is `undefined`. If it is, it attempts to delete the corresponding key from the target object. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **`in` operator**: * Pros: Simple and efficient. * Cons: May not be as fast as other approaches due to its inherent checks. 2. **`hasOwnProperty` method**: * Pros: More accurate than the `in` operator, which can return true for inherited properties. * Cons: May incur additional overhead due to the method call. 3. **`undefined` check**: * Pros: Simple and lightweight. * Cons: May not be as efficient as other approaches if the value is not frequently `undefined`. **Library Usage** None of the benchmark test cases use a library explicitly, but they do rely on JavaScript's built-in object features (e.g., `in`, `hasOwnProperty`, `delete`). **Special JS Feature or Syntax** The benchmark does not explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax. However, it relies on some advanced JavaScript concepts, such as: * Object iteration and traversal (`for...in`) * Property access and manipulation (`sourceKey`, `target[sourceKey]`, `delete target.sourceKey`) **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches to remove keys from an object in JavaScript, consider the following options: 1. **Using a library**: There are libraries like Lodash or Ramda that provide more efficient and expressive ways to manipulate objects. 2. **Alternative iteration methods**: You can use `Object.keys()` or `Object.entries()` to iterate over the object's properties and remove them individually. 3. **Object pruning**: You can use techniques like Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call() to check for the existence of properties, which might be more efficient than using the `in` operator. Keep in mind that the performance differences between these approaches may be negligible for small objects, but they become significant when dealing with large datasets or complex object hierarchies.
Related benchmarks:
Temp obj or in check
Long int keys (19 digits) (one select)
Map vs Object (real-world) Performance (lookup and set)
Map vs Object (real-world) Performance - Forked
Map vs Object (real-world) Performance (better) 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?