Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Luxon add day
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
add 30 in seconds vs add 30 in days
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@1.21.0/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script>
Tests:
add 30 in seconds
const startDate = luxon.DateTime.local().toSeconds(); for (var i = 0; i<30; i++){ startDate + 84000; }
add 30 in days
const startDate = luxon.DateTime.local(); for (var i = 0; i<30; i++){ startDate.plus({days:1}); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
add 30 in seconds
add 30 in days
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its components. **Benchmark Overview** MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks, comparing different approaches to perform the same operation. The provided benchmark involves two test cases: adding 30 seconds and adding 30 days using the Luxon library. **Test Case Comparison** The test cases compare two approaches: 1. **Adding 30 seconds**: This approach uses the `toSeconds()` method of the `luxon.DateTime` object to convert the current date to seconds, then adds 30 seconds repeatedly in a loop. 2. **Adding 30 days**: This approach uses the `plus()` method with an object specifying `days: 1` to add 30 days to the current date, then repeats this operation 30 times in a loop. **Approach Comparison** There are several approaches that can be used to implement these test cases: * **Method 1:** Directly adding seconds or days using primitive types (e.g., `new Date().getTime() + 84000` for seconds). + Pros: Simple, straightforward implementation. + Cons: May involve unnecessary type conversions and calculations. * **Method 2:** Using the Luxon library's `toSeconds()` method to convert dates to seconds. + Pros: More accurate and efficient than direct addition of seconds or days. + Cons: Requires loading an external library (Luxon). * **Method 3:** Using a custom function or class to handle date arithmetic. + Pros: Can be optimized for performance and avoid external dependencies. + Cons: May require additional implementation effort. **Pros and Cons** Each approach has its pros and cons: * Direct addition of seconds or days (Method 1): + Simple, but may not be accurate or efficient. * Using Luxon's `toSeconds()` method (Method 2): + More accurate and efficient, but requires loading an external library. * Custom implementation for date arithmetic (Method 3): + Can be optimized for performance, but requires additional implementation effort. **Library: Luxon** Luxon is a modern JavaScript date library developed by the Date.js project. Its primary purpose is to provide a simple and intuitive API for working with dates and times in JavaScript. In this benchmark, Luxon's `luxon.DateTime` object is used to perform date arithmetic. **Special JS Feature/Syntax: None** This benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond standard JavaScript programming practices. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches for similar benchmarks, consider the following: * **Moment.js**: A popular JavaScript date library that provides a wide range of date manipulation functions. * **Date-fns**: A lightweight JavaScript date library that offers efficient and convenient date arithmetic operations. * **PureScript's Date module**: A functional programming approach to working with dates in JavaScript. These alternatives may offer different trade-offs in terms of performance, ease of use, or dependencies.
Related benchmarks:
Moment vs Luxon getOffset
dategeneration
dategeneration2
luxon vs datefns adding
dayjs vs luxon (manipulating)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?