Benchmark: d3 vs date-fns - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/d3-array@3"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/d3-time@3"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/d3-time-format@4"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/date-fns/1.30.1/date_fns.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

window.__date__ = new Date();
window.__expected__ = '2000/01/06';

Tests:

d3
let timeFormat = d3.timeFormat("%Y/%m/%d"); var actual = timeFormat(__date__); console.assert(actual === __expected__);
date-fns
var actual = dateFns.format(__date__, 'YYYY/MM/DD'); console.assert(actual === __expected__);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
d3
date-fns

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case, where two libraries - D3.js and date-fns - are compared to determine which one is faster for formatting dates.

**Test Cases**

There are two individual test cases:

1. **D3.js**: The first test case uses the `d3.timeFormat` function from the D3.js library to format a date string in the format `%Y/%m/%d`. It then compares the actual formatted string with the expected result using a console.assert statement.
2. **date-fns**: The second test case uses the `format` function from the date-fns library to format a date object in the same format as above. Again, it compares the actual formatted string with the expected result.

**Library Descriptions**

1. **D3.js (Data-Driven Documents)**: D3.js is a popular JavaScript library for producing dynamic, interactive data visualizations in web browsers. It provides a wide range of tools and functions for manipulating and displaying data, including date formatting.
2. **date-fns**: date-fns is a lightweight JavaScript library for working with dates and times. It provides a set of utility functions for formatting, parsing, and manipulating dates, making it a popular choice for date-related tasks.

**Special JS Features/Syntax**

Neither test case uses any special JavaScript features or syntax that requires specific explanation.

**Pros and Cons of Different Approaches**

1. **D3.js**: Pros:
	* Provides a powerful and flexible set of tools for data visualization and manipulation.
	* Supports advanced formatting options and customizations.
Cons:
	* Steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set and complexity.
	* May be overkill for simple date formatting tasks.
2. **date-fns**: Pros:
	* Lightweight and easy to use, with a simple API for common date formatting tasks.
	* Fast and efficient, making it suitable for high-performance applications.
Cons:
	* Limited features compared to D3.js, which may limit its usefulness for more complex data visualization tasks.

**Other Alternatives**

If you need to perform date formatting or manipulation in JavaScript, here are some other alternatives to consider:

1. **Moment.js**: A popular JavaScript library for working with dates and times, providing a simple and intuitive API.
2. **Luxon**: Another lightweight JavaScript library for date and time calculations, offering a flexible and customizable approach.
3. **JavaScript's built-in Date API**: While not as feature-rich as the above libraries, JavaScript's built-in Date API provides basic functionality for working with dates and times.

In summary, the benchmarking test case compares two popular libraries for date formatting: D3.js and date-fns. The choice of library depends on your specific requirements, with D3.js offering more advanced features but a steeper learning curve, and date-fns providing a lightweight and efficient solution for simple date formatting tasks.

Related benchmarks:

d3 vs date-fns (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: d3 vs date-fns

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

d3

date-fns

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):