Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash/isEmpty vs NOT operator
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
lodash/isEmpty vs Native
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var something = null;
Tests:
lodash/isEmpty
_.isEmpty(something)
Native
!something
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash/isEmpty
Native
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what is tested, compared, and analyzed in this JavaScript microbenchmark. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is defined as a comparison between two approaches: 1. `_.isEmpty(something)` using the Lodash library. 2. The native "NOT operator" (`!something`). **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: * Using a library (Lodash) to check if a value is empty or not. * Using a native JavaScript operator (NOT operator) to check if a value is falsey. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **Lodash approach:** Pros: * Provides a clear and explicit way to check for emptiness, making the code more readable and maintainable. * Can be used in a variety of situations where checking for emptiness is necessary (e.g., arrays, objects). Cons: * Adds an additional dependency on the Lodash library, which may not be desirable for smaller projects or projects with tight dependencies constraints. * May have a slight performance overhead due to the library's operations. **Native approach:** Pros: * Does not add any external dependencies, making it suitable for smaller projects or projects with strict dependencies constraints. * Can be faster since it relies on native JavaScript operations. Cons: * Requires a clear understanding of the behavior of the NOT operator in JavaScript. If not used correctly, this can lead to unexpected results. **Library (Lodash) - Purpose** The Lodash library is a popular utility library for JavaScript that provides a wide range of functions for common tasks such as array manipulation, object transformation, and more. In this benchmark, the `_.isEmpty` function is used to check if an array or object is empty. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some modern browsers may have performance optimizations for certain operations, such as array checks, which could affect the results of this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** If you were to write a similar benchmark using different approaches, here are some alternatives: * Using `Array.isArray` and checking if the result is falsey. * Using a custom implementation of an emptiness check function. Keep in mind that these alternatives would likely be similar to the Lodash approach or the native approach respectively.
Related benchmarks:
Null and undefined checks
lodash isNil vs ! Operator
lodash isNil vs native isNil with if
Lodash isEmpty vs Native Javascript
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?