Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
className string concat vs classList
(version: 0)
className string concat vs classList 1. el.className = '1'; 2. add class '2' with string concat or classList add
Comparing performance of:
className string concat vs classList add
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id='test'></div>
Script Preparation code:
var el = document.getElementById('test');
Tests:
className string concat
el.className = '1'; el.className = el.className + ' ' + '2';
classList add
el.className = '1'; el.classList.add('2');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
className string concat
classList add
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition JSON** The website is testing two approaches for adding classes to an HTML element: concatenating strings using the `+` operator, and using the `classList.add()` method. In the benchmark definition, we have two test cases: 1. `className string concat`: This test case creates an HTML element and sets its `className` property to `'1'`. Then, it appends a new class name `'2'` by concatenating strings. 2. `classList add`: This test case does the same as the previous one, but instead of concatenating strings, it uses the `classList.add()` method to add the new class. **Comparison** The benchmark is comparing two approaches: * **String Concatenation**: Using the `+` operator to concatenate strings and set the `className` property. * **classList.add()**: Using the `classList` API to add a class to the element. **Pros and Cons** **String Concatenation:** Pros: * Widely supported across browsers * Simple and easy to understand Cons: * Can lead to performance issues due to string concatenation (e.g., inlining many small strings) * May not be as efficient as `classList.add()` on modern browsers **classList.add():** Pros: * More efficient than string concatenation, especially for large numbers of classes * Less prone to performance issues due to string concatenation * A part of the W3C DOM API and widely supported across browsers Cons: * May not be as widely supported in older browsers (pre-2010s) * Can be less intuitive for some developers who are not familiar with the `classList` API **Library** In this benchmark, there is no explicit library mentioned. However, it's worth noting that the `classList` API is part of the W3C DOM specification and is widely supported across modern browsers. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There isn't any special JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition. The test cases only use basic JavaScript syntax to create an HTML element and manipulate its properties. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches, here are a few options: * Using `addEventListener()` instead of `classList.add()`: Some older browsers (pre-2010s) support this approach. * Using a library like jQuery or Lodash to simplify class manipulation: While not directly related to the benchmark, these libraries can provide additional functionality and abstraction for class management. Keep in mind that the specific alternatives may depend on your use case, target browsers, and performance requirements.
Related benchmarks:
className vs classList by Tyler
ClassList add vs className +=
className vs. setAttribute vs. classList v4
className vs classList with existing classes
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?