Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Map (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash) 5
(version: 3)
measures the speed of ramda's map vs Array's native map vs lodash map
Comparing performance of:
Array (native) vs Array while vs Ramda vs Lodash vs Noop
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script> <script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
function double(n) { return n*2; } var data = [...Array(2000)].map((v, idx) => idx);
Tests:
Array (native)
data.map(double);
Array while
var result = Array(data.length); var idx = 0; while (idx < data.length) { result[idx] = double(data[idx]); idx += 1; }
Ramda
R.map(double, data);
Lodash
_.map(data, double);
Noop
var idx = 0; while (idx < data.length) { idx += 1; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (5)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array (native)
Array while
Ramda
Lodash
Noop
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares the performance of three different approaches to map over an array: 1. **Native Array** (using `Array.map()`) 2. **Ramda's Map** (using `R.map()` from the Ramda library) 3. **Lodash's Map** (using `_map()` from the Lodash library) The benchmark is designed to measure the speed of each approach on a large dataset (2000 elements). **Test Cases** Each test case defines a separate benchmarking scenario: 1. **Array (native)**: This test case uses the native `Array.map()` function. 2. **Array while**: This test case uses a while loop to iterate over the array and assign values to an output array. 3. **Ramda**: This test case uses Ramda's `R.map()` function to map over the input data. 4. **Lodash**: This test case uses Lodash's `_map()` function to map over the input data. 5. **Noop**: This test case uses a no-op operation (doing nothing) as the mapping function. **Library Explanation** * **Ramda**: Ramda is a functional programming library for JavaScript that provides a set of higher-order functions for working with data. In this benchmark, `R.map()` is used to map over the input array. * **Lodash**: Lodash is another popular utility library for JavaScript that provides a wide range of functions for working with data, strings, and more. `_map()` is a key function in Lodash's mapping utilities. **Special JS Features** None of these test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's standard. **Pros and Cons** * **Native Array**: The native `Array.map()` function is often the most efficient way to map over an array, as it's optimized for performance. However, it can be less readable and more error-prone than using a higher-order function like Ramda's `R.map()`. * **Ramda's Map**: Using Ramda's `R.map()` provides a concise and expressive way to map over data, making the code easier to read and maintain. However, it may introduce additional overhead due to the library's functions being called. * **Lodash's Map**: Lodash's `_map()` function is similar to Ramda's `R.map()`, offering a concise and readable way to map over data. However, it also introduces additional overhead from the library's functions. **Other Alternatives** Other alternatives for mapping over arrays in JavaScript include: * Using `forEach()` instead of `map()` * Implementing a custom map function using an arrow function or a traditional function * Using other libraries like jQuery or Underscore.js
Related benchmarks:
Map (Native vs Rambda vs Lodash)
Map (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash)333
Map (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash) latest 2021-01-18
Map (Native vs Ramda vs Lodash) v2
Map (Native vs Ramda 0.27.2 vs Lodash 4.17.21) 50k
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?