Benchmark: for in vs iterate over keys

Script Preparation code:

var obj = {
  'a': 1,
  'b': 1,
  'c': 1,
  'd': 1,
  'e': 1,
  'f': 1,
  'g': 1
};

var objKeys = ['a','b','c','d','e','f','g'];

Tests:

for in
for (var i=10000; i > 0; i--) { for (var key in obj) { console.log(obj[key]); } }
iterate over keys
for (var i=10000; i > 0; i--) { objKeys.forEach(key => console.log(obj[key])); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
for in
iterate over keys

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 121 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

for in

4/s

iterate over keys

4/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ for in	4 Ops/sec
iterate over keys	4 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**What is being tested?**

The provided JSON benchmark test case measures the performance difference between two approaches to iterate over the keys of an object:

1. Using `for...in` loop
2. Using `forEach()` method with an array of keys

**Options compared:**

* **For-in loop**: Iterates over the object's own enumerable properties, including inherited properties.
* **ForEach() method**: Iterates over a sequence (array, iterable) and applies a callback function to each element.

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

* **For-in loop**:
	+ Pros:
		- Can access both own properties and inherited properties using the `in` keyword.
		- Can be used to iterate over objects that don't support `forEach()`.
	+ Cons:
		- May have performance issues due to slow iteration over inherited properties.
		- Less predictable behavior when iterating over objects with complex inheritance hierarchies.
* **ForEach() method**:
	+ Pros:
		- More efficient and faster than the for-in loop, especially for large arrays.
		- More predictable behavior, as it's designed for iterating over sequences.
	+ Cons:
		- Only works on arrays or iterables (not objects).
		- Does not provide access to inherited properties.

**Special JS feature/syntax:**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes used in this benchmark. The test focuses solely on the performance comparison between two iteration approaches.

**Library usage:**

None of the test cases use any external libraries. The `forEach()` method is a built-in JavaScript function, while the `for...in` loop uses only standard language constructs.

**Other alternatives:**

If you're looking for alternative ways to iterate over object keys, consider using:

* **Object.keys()**: Returns an array of own enumerable property names.
* **Object.getOwnPropertyNames()**: Returns all own properties (including inherited) as an array.
* **for...of loop**: Introduced in ECMAScript 2015, this loop iterates over iterable objects, including arrays and sets.

Keep in mind that the choice of iteration method depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and language version.

for in vs iterate over keys (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: `for in vs iterate over keys`

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

for in

iterate over keys

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

for in vs iterate over keys (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: for in vs iterate over keys

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

for in

iterate over keys

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `for in vs iterate over keys`