Benchmark: Find Keys by loop or JSON stringify

Script Preparation code:

var testObject = {};
testObject.eligibilityGroupDates = [{
    "id": "8c7969fd-56db-4ed8-9eec-5604c3dceef7",
    "o2eStartDate": "scrub1",
    "numOfDaysToCalO2EStartDate": null,
    "numberOfDaysToEnroll": 99,
    "eligibilityGroups": ["f32e6a9f-4a4b-4531-af8f-4e4ee0798e91"],
    "links": []
}, {
    "id": "7dc6052d-7ede-452a-8425-604c24c3d561",
    "o2eStartDate": "scrub2",
    "numOfDaysToCalO2EStartDate": 58,
    "numberOfDaysToEnroll": 95,
    "eligibilityGroups": ["f9987b9a-f45a-4131-8528-47242023483e"],
    "links": []
}, {
    "id": "af886791-fb79-4d28-921c-539cdaadae79",
    "o2eStartDate": "scrub2",
    "numOfDaysToCalO2EStartDate": null,
    "numberOfDaysToEnroll": 30,
    "eligibilityGroups": ["927a5c93-368c-4a82-a6d3-99e656624978"],
    "links": []
}];

Tests:

using loop
if (_.has(testObject, 'eligibilityGroupDates')) { testObject.eligibilityGroupDates.forEach(entry => { Object.keys(entry).forEach(key => { switch (key) { case 'eligibilityGroupDates': _.set(testObject, 'displayEligibilityGroupDates', true); break; case 'o2eStartDate': _.set(testObject, 'displayO2eStartDate', true); break; case 'numOfDaysToCalO2EStartDate': _.set(testObject, 'displayNumOfDaysToCalO2EStartDate', true); break; case 'numberOfDaysToEnroll': _.set(testObject, 'displayNumberOfDaysToEnroll', true); break; default: break; } }); }); }
using JSON stringify
if (_.has(testObject, 'eligibilityGroupDates')) { let value = JSON.stringify(testObject.eligibilityGroupDates); if (value.indexOf('eligibilityGroups') > 0) { _.set(testObject, 'eligibilityGroups', true); } if (value.indexOf('o2eStartDate') > 0) { _.set(testObject, 'displayO2eStartDate', true); } if (value.indexOf('numOfDaysToCalO2EStartDate') > 0) { _.set(testObject, 'displayNumOfDaysToCalO2EStartDate', true); } if (value.indexOf('numberOfDaysToEnroll') > 0) { _.set(testObject, 'displayNumberOfDaysToEnroll', true); } }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
using loop
using JSON stringify

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/136.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 136 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

using loop

1.7M/s

using JSON stringify

1.0M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ using loop	1,738,437 Ops/sec
using JSON stringify	1,048,875 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of two different approaches for finding keys in an object: using a loop or by stringifying the object and searching for specific key values.

**Options Compared**

There are two main options being compared:

1. **Using a loop**: This approach involves iterating over the `eligibilityGroupDates` array using a traditional loop, checking each property of each object in the array.
2. **Using JSON stringify**: This approach involves stringifying the entire `eligibilityGroupDates` array and then searching for specific key values within that string.

**Pros and Cons**

1. **Using a loop**:
	* Pros: More straightforward and easier to understand, as it directly accesses each property of each object in the array.
	* Cons: May be slower due to the overhead of iterating over the array and checking each property individually.
2. **Using JSON stringify**:
	* Pros: Can potentially be faster if the stringification process is more efficient than iterating over the array, especially for large datasets.
	* Cons: Requires additional processing time to convert the object into a string, which may add overhead.

**Library Used**

The benchmark uses the `lodash` library, specifically the `_has`, `_set`, and `JSON.stringify` functions. Lodash is a popular utility library that provides a wide range of functions for working with arrays, objects, and strings in JavaScript.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark beyond the standard ECMAScript syntax. However, the use of `_.has`, `_set`, and `JSON.stringify` from Lodash does require a basic understanding of these utility functions.

**Other Alternatives**

Some alternative approaches for finding keys in an object might include:

1. **Using the `in` operator**: Instead of using a loop or stringification, you could use the `in` operator to check if a property exists within the object.
2. **Using a regular expression**: If you need to search for multiple properties across the entire object, you might consider using a regular expression to match against the desired keys.
3. **Using a more specialized data structure**: Depending on the specific requirements of your application, you might be able to use a more specialized data structure, such as an indexed array or a trie, to improve performance.

In summary, this benchmark provides a simple and clear comparison between two approaches for finding keys in an object: using a loop versus using JSON stringify. By understanding the pros and cons of each approach, developers can make informed decisions about which method is best suited for their specific use case.

Find Keys by loop or JSON stringify (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: `using loop vs using JSON stringify`

Created: 4 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

using loop

using JSON stringify

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Find Keys by loop or JSON stringify (version: 0) Benchmark.js

Comparing performance of: using loop vs using JSON stringify

Created: 4 years ago by: Registered User

Go to the latest result

using loop

using JSON stringify

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Comparing performance of: `using loop vs using JSON stringify`