Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
DateTime vs Date2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Luxon DateTime vs Native Date
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@1.2.0/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script>
Tests:
Luxon DateTime
luxon.DateTime.fromISO('2021-11-11T01:00:00.000+01:00')
Native Date
new Date('2021-11-11T01:00:00.000+01:00')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Luxon DateTime
Native Date
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and discussed. **Benchmark Overview** MeasureThat.net is a platform for testing JavaScript performance. The provided benchmark compares the performance of two approaches to work with dates in JavaScript: using the built-in `Date` object (`Native Date`) versus using the Luxon library (`Luxon DateTime`). **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code includes a single line that loads the Luxon library from a CDN: ```javascript <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@1.2.0/build/global/luxon.min.js"></script> ``` This suggests that the benchmark is using the Luxon library for comparison. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Luxon DateTime**: The benchmark definition uses `luxon.DateTime.fromISO('2021-11-11T01:00:00.000+01:00')`, which creates a new `DateTime` object from an ISO-formatted string. 2. **Native Date**: The benchmark definition uses `new Date('2021-11-11T01:00:00.000+01:00')`, which creates a new `Date` object from the same ISO-formatted string. **Comparison** The two test cases are designed to compare the performance of using Luxon's `DateTime` class versus the built-in `Date` object in JavaScript. The benchmark likely measures the execution time, number of executions per second, or other performance metrics for each approach. **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches** 1. **Luxon DateTime**: Using a library like Luxon can provide benefits such as: * Improved date parsing accuracy * Simplified date formatting and manipulation * Better support for edge cases (e.g., daylight saving time) However, it may also introduce additional overhead due to the library's functionality. 2. **Native Date**: The built-in `Date` object is a lightweight, built-in part of JavaScript. It provides: * Native performance optimization * Simplified date manipulation and formatting * Low overhead However, it may not offer the same level of accuracy or features as Luxon. **Library: Luxon** Luxon is a popular JavaScript library for working with dates and times. Its primary purpose is to provide a more accurate and intuitive way of handling dates, especially when dealing with edge cases like daylight saving time or timezone conversions. **Special JS Feature/Syntax: None** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes used in this benchmark that require explanation. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative libraries for date manipulation, some popular options include: 1. Moment.js 2. DayPilot 3. js-date These libraries offer different strengths and weaknesses compared to Luxon. For example, Moment.js is known for its ease of use and popularity, while DayPilot provides more advanced features like scheduling and calendar handling. In summary, the MeasureThat.net benchmark compares the performance of two approaches to work with dates in JavaScript: using Luxon's `DateTime` class versus the built-in `Date` object. The comparison highlights the trade-offs between using a library for improved accuracy and features versus relying on native functionality for simplicity and low overhead.
Related benchmarks:
luxon3 vs datefns
luxon.fromSeconds(seconds) vs Date(seconds * 1000)
luxon.fromSeconds vs luxon.fromJSDate
luxon vs datefns adding
Luxon vs Native ISO date parsing
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?