Benchmark: find vs findIndex - search in object array

Tests:

find
var __POSTS = [ { id: 1, title: 'Apple', description: 'Description of post 1' }, { id: 2, title: 'Orange', description: 'Description of post 2' }, { id: 3, title: 'Guava', description: 'Description of post 3' }, { id: 4, title: 'Banana', description: 'Description of post 4' } ]; var __FOUND = __POSTS.find(function(post, index) { if(post.title == 'Guava') return true; });
findIndex
var __POSTS = [ { id: 1, title: 'Apple', description: 'Description of post 1' }, { id: 2, title: 'Orange', description: 'Description of post 2' }, { id: 3, title: 'Guava', description: 'Description of post 3' }, { id: 4, title: 'Banana', description: 'Description of post 4' } ]; var __FOUND = __POSTS.findIndex(function(post, index) { if(post.title == 'Guava') return true; });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
find
findIndex

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and explain what is being tested.

**What is being tested?**

The provided benchmark definition tests the performance of two JavaScript methods: `Array.prototype.find()` and `Array.prototype.findIndex()`. These methods are used to search for an element in an array that matches a certain condition.

**Options compared:**

The two options being compared are:

1. `find()` method
2. `findIndex()` method

Both methods take a callback function as an argument, which is executed for each element in the array. The difference lies in what they return:

* `find()` returns the first element that satisfies the condition, or `undefined` if no such element exists.
* `findIndex()` returns the index of the first element that satisfies the condition, or `-1` if no such element exists.

**Pros and Cons:**

Here are some pros and cons of each method:

* `find()`
	+ Pros:
		- Simpler to understand and use
		- Returns a value (the found element) rather than an index
	+ Cons:
		- May cause unnecessary re-evaluation of the entire array if the condition is not met for any element
* `findIndex()`
	+ Pros:
		- More efficient, as it stops iterating as soon as it finds a matching element
		- Returns an index, which can be useful for certain use cases
	+ Cons:
		- Less intuitive to understand and use, especially for developers not familiar with array methods

**Library usage:**

There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, both `Array.prototype.find()` and `Array.prototype.findIndex()` are built-in methods of the Array object in JavaScript.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

The benchmark does not utilize any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's standard for the given methods.

**Other alternatives:**

If you need to search an array without using these two methods, some alternative approaches include:

* Using a `for` loop with indexing
* Utilizing other third-party libraries that provide similar functionality (e.g., Lodash's `findIndex()` method)
* Implementing your own custom searching algorithm

Keep in mind that the performance difference between these methods can be significant for large datasets, especially when working with modern JavaScript engines.

As a side note, it's worth noting that the benchmark seems to only include results from Chrome 95 running on Linux. If you're interested in comparing across different browsers or platforms, you might want to consider adding additional test cases to your benchmarking setup.

Related benchmarks:

find vs findIndex - search in object array (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: find vs findIndex

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

find

findIndex

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):